Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Jul 26;16(156):20190207. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0207. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Owing to the finding that Dengvaxia (the only licensed dengue vaccine to date) increases the risk of severe illness among seronegative recipients, the World Health Organization has recommended screening individuals for their serostatus prior to vaccination. To decide whether and how to carry out screening, it is necessary to estimate the transmission intensity of dengue and to understand the performance of the screening method. In this study, we inferred the annual force of infection (FOI; a measurement of transmission intensity) of dengue virus in three locations in Vietnam: An Giang (FOI = 0.04 for the below 10 years age group and FOI = 0.20 for the above 10 years age group), Ho Chi Minh City (FOI = 0.12) and Quang Ngai (FOI = 0.05). In addition, we show that using a quantitative approach to immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels (measured by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) can help to distinguish individuals with primary exposures (primary seropositive) from those with secondary exposures (secondary seropositive). We found that primary-seropositive individuals-the main targets of the vaccine-tend to have a lower IgG level, and, thus, they have a higher chance of being misclassified as seronegative than secondary-seropositive cases. However, screening performance can be improved by incorporating patient age and transmission intensity into the interpretation of IgG levels.
由于发现登革热疫苗(Dengvaxia,目前唯一获得许可的登革热疫苗)会增加血清阴性接受者罹患重病的风险,世界卫生组织建议在接种疫苗前对个人的血清状况进行筛查。为了决定是否以及如何进行筛查,有必要评估登革热的传播强度,并了解筛查方法的性能。在这项研究中,我们推断了越南三个地点的登革病毒年感染率(衡量传播强度的指标):安江(10 岁以下年龄组的感染率为 0.04,10 岁以上年龄组的感染率为 0.20)、胡志明市(感染率为 0.12)和广奈(感染率为 0.05)。此外,我们还表明,使用定量方法测量免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)水平(通过间接酶联免疫吸附试验测量)可以帮助区分初次接触(初次血清阳性)和再次接触(再次血清阳性)的个体。我们发现,初次血清阳性的个体(疫苗的主要目标人群)的 IgG 水平往往较低,因此,他们被错误分类为血清阴性的几率高于再次血清阳性的个体。然而,通过将患者年龄和传播强度纳入 IgG 水平的解释中,可以提高筛查性能。