Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Nov;54(6):914-926. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12495. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a heterogeneous group of language-led dementias. People with this type of dementia are increasingly being referred to speech and language therapy (SLT) services. Yet, there is a paucity of research evidence focusing on PPA interventions and little is known about SLT practice in terms of assessment and provision of intervention.
To survey the practices of SLTs in the areas of assessment and intervention for people with PPA.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: A 37-item, pilot-tested survey was distributed electronically through the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (RCSLT), Clinical Excellence Networks (CENs) and social media networks. Survey items included questions on care pathways, assessment and intervention approaches, and future planning. Analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: A total of 105 SLTs completed the survey. Respondents reported more frequently using formal assessment tools designed for stroke-related aphasia than for dementia. Informal interviews were reportedly always used during assessment by almost 80% of respondents. Respondents were significantly more likely to use communication partner training than impairment-focused interventions. Goal attainment was the most commonly used outcome measure. Respondents provided 88 goal examples, which fell into six themes: communication aid; conversation; functional communication; impairment focused; specific strategy; and communication partner. Additionally, respondents reported addressing areas such as future deterioration in communication and cognition, decision-making and mental capacity, and driving. Ten (9.4%) respondents reported the existence of a care pathway for people with PPA within their service.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This survey highlights the range of current PPA assessment and intervention practices in use by the respondents. Communication partner training is commonly used by the surveyed SLTs, despite the lack of research evidence examining its effectiveness for PPA. There is a need to develop evidence-based care pathways for people with PPA in order to advocate for further commissioning of clinical services.
原发性进行性失语症(PPA)描述了一组异质性的以语言为主导的痴呆症。患有这种类型痴呆症的人越来越多地被转介到言语治疗(SLT)服务。然而,针对 PPA 干预措施的研究证据很少,关于 SLT 在评估和提供干预方面的实践知之甚少。
调查言语治疗师在 PPA 患者评估和干预方面的实践情况。
通过皇家言语治疗师学院(RCSLT)、临床卓越网络(CEN)和社交媒体网络,以电子方式分发了一份包含 37 个项目的试点测试调查。调查项目包括关于护理途径、评估和干预方法以及未来规划的问题。分析采用描述性统计和主题分析。
共有 105 名言语治疗师完成了调查。报告称,与痴呆症相比,他们更频繁地使用专为与中风相关的失语症设计的正式评估工具。近 80%的受访者表示,在评估过程中始终会进行非正式访谈。与以损害为中心的干预措施相比,受访者更有可能使用沟通伙伴培训。目标实现是最常用的结果衡量标准。受访者提供了 88 个目标示例,这些示例分为六个主题:沟通辅助工具;对话;功能性沟通;以损害为中心;特定策略;以及沟通伙伴。此外,受访者报告了处理与沟通和认知未来恶化、决策和心理能力以及驾驶等相关问题。10(9.4%)名受访者报告称,他们所在的服务机构存在针对 PPA 患者的护理途径。
这项调查强调了受访者目前使用的 PPA 评估和干预实践的范围。尽管缺乏研究证据来检验其对 PPA 的有效性,但沟通伙伴培训在被调查的言语治疗师中很常见。需要为 PPA 患者制定基于证据的护理途径,以倡导进一步为临床服务提供资金。