Xu Kai, Li Ya-Ling, Song Fei, Liu Hua-Wei, Yang Hua-Dong, Xiao Song-Hua
Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4505-4513. doi: 10.1177/0300060519864183. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of different bone cement distributions along the fracture line on clinical and imaging outcomes of vertebral augmentation.
In total, 84 patients who underwent vertebral augmentation for a single osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture from January 2016 to August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were divided into two groups according to the relationship between the bone cement distribution and the fracture line: the unilateral group (n = 23) and the bilateral group (n = 61). Postoperative clinical and imaging parameters were compared between the two groups.
Statistical analyses showed no significant difference in postoperative pain relief, bone cement leakage, nerve injury, or new vertebral fracture between the two groups. Significant recovery from vertebral compression was observed in the bilateral group after surgery, but there was no significant difference in vertebral compression after surgery in the unilateral group.
Pain relief was similar for different types of cement distributions along the fracture line, but a bilateral cement distribution exhibited better recovery from vertebral compression and did not increase bone cement leakage in the vertebral augmentation procedure.
本研究旨在评估沿骨折线不同骨水泥分布对椎体强化临床及影像学结果的影响。
回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年8月期间因单一骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折接受椎体强化治疗的84例患者。根据骨水泥分布与骨折线的关系将这些患者分为两组:单侧组(n = 23)和双侧组(n = 61)。比较两组术后的临床及影像学参数。
统计分析显示,两组术后疼痛缓解、骨水泥渗漏、神经损伤或新发椎体骨折方面无显著差异。双侧组术后椎体压缩有显著恢复,但单侧组术后椎体压缩无显著差异。
沿骨折线不同类型的骨水泥分布在疼痛缓解方面相似,但双侧骨水泥分布在椎体强化过程中椎体压缩恢复更好且未增加骨水泥渗漏。