Tuberculosis;Acute Respiratory, Gastrointestinal, Emerging/Zoonotic Infections;and Travel and Migrant Health Division,National Infection Service,Public Health England,London,UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections,Liverpool,UK.
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Jan;147:e215. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819000864.
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection can cause serious illness including haemolytic uraemic syndrome. The role of socio-economic status (SES) in differential clinical presentation and exposure to potential risk factors amongst STEC cases has not previously been reported in England. We conducted an observational study using a dataset of all STEC cases identified in England, 2010-2015. Odds ratios for clinical characteristics of cases and foodborne, waterborne and environmental risk factors were estimated using logistic regression, stratified by SES, adjusting for baseline demographic factors. Incidence was higher in the highest SES group compared to the lowest (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.19-2.00). Odds of Accident and Emergency attendance (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.75) and hospitalisation (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.36-2.15) because of illness were higher in the most disadvantaged compared to the least, suggesting potential lower ascertainment of milder cases or delayed care-seeking behaviour in disadvantaged groups. Advantaged individuals were significantly more likely to report salad/fruit/vegetable/herb consumption (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.17), non-UK or UK travel (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.40-2.27; OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.35-2.56) and environmental exposures (walking in a paddock, OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22-2.70; soil contact, OR 1.52, 95% CI 2.13-1.09) suggesting other unmeasured risks, such as person-to-person transmission, could be more important in the most disadvantaged group.
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)感染可导致严重疾病,包括溶血尿毒综合征。在英格兰,社会经济地位(SES)在 STEC 病例的临床表现差异和接触潜在危险因素方面的作用以前尚未报道过。我们使用 2010-2015 年在英格兰确定的所有 STEC 病例的数据集进行了一项观察性研究。使用逻辑回归,根据 SES 对病例的临床特征和食源性、水源性和环境危险因素进行分层,调整基线人口统计学因素后,估计了比值比。与 SES 最低组相比,SES 最高组的发病率更高(RR 1.54,95%CI 1.19-2.00)。与 SES 最低组相比,最弱势群体因疾病而到急症就诊(OR 1.35,95%CI 1.10-1.75)和住院(OR 1.71,95%CI 1.36-2.15)的可能性更高,这表明在弱势群体中,轻症病例的确诊率可能较低,或者寻求治疗的时间可能较晚。优势个体更有可能报告沙拉/水果/蔬菜/草药消费(OR 1.59,95%CI 1.16-2.17)、非英国或英国旅行(OR 1.76,95%CI 1.40-2.27;OR 1.85,95%CI 1.35-2.56)和环境暴露(在牧场上行走,OR 1.82,95%CI 1.22-2.70;接触土壤,OR 1.52,95%CI 2.13-1.09),这表明其他未测量的风险,如人际传播,在最弱势群体中可能更为重要。