Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey.
Breastfeed Med. 2019 Oct;14(8):523-532. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2019.0110. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
The term "breastfeeding" has recently been critiqued for its ambiguity, as it has come to mean both (1) feeding an infant at the breast and (2) feeding expressed human milk to an infant. In addition, "breastfeeding" is nearly always associated with mothers and women, yet there are individuals who feed their infants human milk and do not identify as such. By using gendered language when conducting and publishing lactation-related research, we risk both alienating an already marginalized population and inhibiting our ability to gather valid, high-quality surveillance data. For example, of 15 U.S. surveys measuring breastfeeding rates, practices, and public opinions, 33% only sampled mothers, and another 33% made assumptions regarding the gender or sex identity of the person giving birth or breastfeeding. In addition, a review of 20 scholarly journals that publish lactation-related research found that only one requires specific language for breastfeeding in their instructions for authors. In response, I recommend several additions to recently proposed terms that describe human milk feeding and associated behaviors. Acceptance and consistent usage of these linguistically inclusive or nongendered terms by researchers will further enhance the quality of future data collection and research dissemination through the representation of all individuals choosing to provide human milk to their infants.
“母乳喂养”一词最近因其模糊性而受到批评,因为它既可以指(1)用乳房喂养婴儿,也可以指(2)用母乳喂养婴儿。此外,“母乳喂养”几乎总是与母亲和女性联系在一起,但也有一些人用母乳喂养婴儿,却不认同自己的身份。在进行和发表与哺乳相关的研究时使用性别语言,我们不仅有可能疏远已经边缘化的人群,而且还可能阻碍我们收集有效、高质量的监测数据的能力。例如,在 15 项衡量美国母乳喂养率、实践和公众意见的调查中,有 33%的调查只对母亲进行了抽样,另有 33%的调查对分娩或母乳喂养者的性别或性别认同做出了假设。此外,对 20 种发表与哺乳相关研究的学术期刊进行的审查发现,只有一种期刊在其作者指南中对母乳喂养提出了具体语言要求。对此,我建议对最近提出的描述人乳喂养和相关行为的术语进行一些修改。研究人员接受并一致使用这些语言包容性或非性别术语,将通过代表所有选择用母乳喂养婴儿的个人来提高未来数据收集和研究传播的质量。