Suppr超能文献

“孕产妇死亡应该为零”:埃塞俄比亚孕产妇死亡报告和审查过程的政治化。

'Maternal deaths should simply be 0': politicization of maternal death reporting and review processes in Ethiopia.

机构信息

Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 21, N-5007 Bergen, Norway.

National Data Management Center for Health, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Gulelle Arbegnoch Street, Gulele Sub City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2019 Sep 1;34(7):492-498. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz075.

Abstract

The Maternal Death Surveillance and Response system (MDSR) was implemented in Ethiopia in 2013 to record and review maternal deaths. The overall aim of the system is to identify and address gaps in order to prevent future death but, to date, around 10% of the expected number of deaths are reported. This article examines practices and reasoning involved in maternal death reporting and review practices in Ethiopia, building on the concept of 'practical norms'. The study is based on multi-sited fieldwork at different levels of the Ethiopian health system including interviews, document analysis and observations, and has documented the politicized nature of MDSR implementation. Death reporting and review are challenged by the fact that maternal mortality is a main indicator of health system performance. Health workers and bureaucrats strive to balance conflicting demands when implementing the MDSR system: to report all deaths; to deliver perceived success in maternal mortality reduction by reporting as few deaths as possible; and to avoid personalized accountability for deaths. Fear of personal and political accountability for maternal deaths strongly influences not only reporting practices but also the care given in the study sites. Health workers report maternal deaths in ways that minimize their number and deflect responsibility for adverse outcomes. They attribute deaths to community and infrastructural factors, which are often beyond their control. The practical norms of how health workers report deaths perpetuate a skewed way of seeing problems and solutions in maternal health. On the basis of our findings, we argue that closer attention to the broader political context is needed to understand the implementation of MDSR and other surveillance systems.

摘要

孕产妇死亡监测和应对系统(MDSR)于 2013 年在埃塞俄比亚实施,旨在记录和审查孕产妇死亡事件。该系统的总体目标是确定和解决差距,以防止未来的死亡,但迄今为止,报告的死亡人数约为预期的 10%。本文基于“实践规范”的概念,考察了埃塞俄比亚孕产妇死亡报告和审查实践中的做法和推理。该研究基于在埃塞俄比亚卫生系统的不同层次进行的多地点实地工作,包括访谈、文件分析和观察,并记录了 MDSR 实施的政治化性质。死亡报告和审查受到以下事实的挑战:孕产妇死亡率是卫生系统绩效的主要指标。卫生工作者和官僚在实施 MDSR 系统时努力平衡相互冲突的需求:报告所有死亡事件;通过尽可能少报告死亡事件来实现减少孕产妇死亡率的预期成功;并避免因死亡事件而承担个人责任。对孕产妇死亡的个人和政治责任的恐惧不仅强烈影响报告做法,还影响研究地点的护理。卫生工作者以尽量减少死亡人数和转移对不良结果的责任的方式报告孕产妇死亡事件。他们将死亡归因于社区和基础设施因素,这些因素往往超出了他们的控制范围。卫生工作者报告死亡的实践规范使人们对孕产妇健康问题和解决方案产生了扭曲的看法。基于我们的发现,我们认为需要更密切关注更广泛的政治背景,以了解 MDSR 和其他监测系统的实施情况。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验