Olivier de Sardan Jean-Pierre, Diarra Aïssa, Moha Mahaman
LASDEL, Niamey, Niger.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jul 12;15(Suppl 1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0213-9.
As in other areas of international development, we are witnessing the proliferation of 'traveling models' developed by international experts and introduced in an almost identical format across numerous countries to improve some aspect of maternal health systems in low- and middle-income countries. These policies and protocols are based on 'miracle mechanisms' that have been taken out of their original context but are believed to be intrinsically effective in light of their operational devices.In reality, standardised interventions are, in Africa and elsewhere, confronted with pragmatic implementation contexts that are always varied and specific, and which lead to drifts, distortions, dismemberments and bypasses. The partogram, focused antenatal care, the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV or performance-based payment all illustrate these implementation gaps, often caused by the routine behaviour of health personnel who follow practical norms (and a professional culture) that are often distinct from official norms - as is the case with midwives.Experiences in maternal and child health in Africa suggest that an alternative approach would be to start with the daily reality of social and practical norms instead of relying on models, and to promote innovations that emerge from within local health systems.
与国际发展的其他领域一样,我们看到国际专家开发的“流动模式”不断扩散,并以几乎相同的形式在许多国家推行,以改善低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健系统的某些方面。这些政策和方案基于“神奇机制”,这些机制脱离了其原本的背景,但鉴于其运作手段,被认为本质上是有效的。实际上,在非洲和其他地方,标准化干预措施面临的实际实施情况总是各不相同且具体的,这导致了偏差、扭曲、肢解和规避。产程图、重点产前护理、预防母婴传播艾滋病毒或按绩效付费都说明了这些实施差距,这些差距往往是由卫生人员的日常行为造成的,他们遵循的实际规范(和职业文化)往往与官方规范不同——助产士的情况就是如此。非洲母婴健康方面的经验表明,另一种方法是从社会和实际规范的日常现实出发,而不是依赖模式,并推广当地卫生系统内部产生的创新。