Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, P.O. Box 90158, 4800, RK, Breda, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, AZ, 1105, The Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jul 31;20(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2711-0.
In the treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis (LE) no single intervention concerning injection therapies has been proven to be the most effective with regard to pain reduction. In this trial 3 injection therapies (perforation with application of autologous blood, perforation with application of dextrose and perforation only) will be compared in a standardized and ultrasound guided way. The objective is to assess the effectiveness of these 3 injection therapies on pain, quality of life and functional recovery. By conducting this study, we hope to make a statement on the effectiveness of injection therapy in the treatment of LE. Hereby, unnecessary treatments can be avoided, a more universal method of treatment can be established and the quality of the treatment can be improved.
METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a superiority design and 12 months follow-up will be conducted in four Dutch hospitals. One hundred sixty five patients will be recruited in the age of 18 to 65 years, with chronic symptomatic lateral epicondylitis lasting longer than 6 weeks, which have concordant pain during physical examination. Patients will be randomized by block randomization to one of the three treatment arms. The treatment will be blinded for patients and outcome assessors. The following three injection therapies are compared: perforation with application of autologous blood, perforation with application of dextrose and perforation only. Injections will be performed ultrasound guided in a standardized and automated way. The primary endpoint is: pain (change in 'Visual Analogue Scale'). Secondary endpoints are quality of life and functional recovery. These measurements are collected at baseline, 8 weeks, 5 months and 1 year after treatment.
When completed, this trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness of injection therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis on pain, quality of life and functional recovery. In current literature proper comparison of the effectiveness of injectables for LE is questionable, due to the lack of standardization of the treatment. This study will overcome bias due to manually performed injection therapy.
This study is registered in the Trial Register ( www.trialregister.nl ) of the Dutch Cochrane centre. Trial ID; NTR4569. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4569.
在治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎(LE)方面,没有任何一种单一的注射治疗方法被证明在减轻疼痛方面是最有效的。在这项试验中,将以标准化和超声引导的方式比较 3 种注射治疗(自体血注射穿孔、葡萄糖注射穿孔和单纯穿孔)。目的是评估这 3 种注射疗法对疼痛、生活质量和功能恢复的效果。通过进行这项研究,我们希望对注射疗法在治疗 LE 中的有效性做出说明。这样,就可以避免不必要的治疗,建立更普遍的治疗方法,并提高治疗质量。
方法/设计:在四家荷兰医院进行多中心、随机对照、优效性设计临床试验,随访时间为 12 个月。招募年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间、有慢性症状性外侧肱骨上髁炎病史超过 6 周、体格检查时有一致性疼痛的 165 名患者。将通过区组随机化将患者随机分配到 3 种治疗组中的一种。治疗对患者和结果评估者均为盲法。比较以下 3 种注射治疗:自体血注射穿孔、葡萄糖注射穿孔和单纯穿孔。注射将以标准化和自动化的方式进行超声引导。主要终点是:疼痛(“视觉模拟量表”变化)。次要终点是生活质量和功能恢复。这些测量值在基线、8 周、5 个月和治疗后 1 年进行收集。
当完成后,该试验将提供关于注射疗法在治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎的疼痛、生活质量和功能恢复方面的有效性的证据。在当前的文献中,由于缺乏治疗的标准化,注射治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎的有效性的适当比较存在疑问。这项研究将克服由于手动注射治疗而产生的偏倚。
这项研究在荷兰 Cochrane 中心的试验登记处(www.trialregister.nl)注册。试验编号:NTR4569。http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4569。