• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

花朵、叶子还是两者兼顾?如何获取适合自动植物识别的图像。

Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification.

作者信息

Rzanny Michael, Mäder Patrick, Deggelmann Alice, Chen Minqian, Wäldchen Jana

机构信息

1Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, Jena, Germany.

2Software Engineering for Safety-Critical Systems Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstr. 20, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.

出版信息

Plant Methods. 2019 Jul 23;15:77. doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4
PMID:31367223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6651978/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep learning algorithms for automated plant identification need large quantities of precisely labelled images in order to produce reliable classification results. Here, we explore what kind of perspectives and their combinations contain more characteristic information and therefore allow for higher identification accuracy.

RESULTS

We developed an image-capturing scheme to create observations of flowering plants. Each observation comprises five in-situ images of the same individual from predefined perspectives (entire plant, flower frontal- and lateral view, leaf top- and back side view). We collected a completely balanced dataset comprising 100 observations for each of 101 species with an emphasis on groups of conspecific and visually similar species including twelve Poaceae species. We used this dataset to train convolutional neural networks and determine the prediction accuracy for each single perspective and their combinations via score level fusion. Top-1 accuracies ranged between 77% (entire plant) and 97% (fusion of all perspectives) when averaged across species. Flower frontal view achieved the highest accuracy (88%). Fusing flower frontal, flower lateral and leaf top views yields the most reasonable compromise with respect to acquisition effort and accuracy (96%). The perspective achieving the highest accuracy was species dependent.

CONCLUSIONS

We argue that image databases of herbaceous plants would benefit from multi organ observations, comprising at least the front and lateral perspective of flowers and the leaf top view.

摘要

背景

用于植物自动识别的深度学习算法需要大量精确标注的图像才能产生可靠的分类结果。在此,我们探讨何种视角及其组合包含更多特征信息,从而实现更高的识别准确率。

结果

我们开发了一种图像采集方案来创建开花植物的观测数据。每次观测包括从预定义视角(整株植物、花朵正视图和侧视图、叶片顶面和背面视图)对同一植株拍摄的五张原位图像。我们收集了一个完全平衡的数据集,包含101个物种中每个物种的100次观测数据,重点关注同物种和视觉上相似的物种组,包括12种禾本科植物。我们使用该数据集训练卷积神经网络,并通过分数级融合确定每个单一视角及其组合的预测准确率。跨物种平均时,top-1准确率在77%(整株植物)至97%(所有视角融合)之间。花朵正视图的准确率最高(88%)。融合花朵正视图、花朵侧视图和叶片顶视图在采集工作量和准确率方面达到了最合理的折衷(96%)。准确率最高的视角因物种而异。

结论

我们认为草本植物的图像数据库将受益于多器官观测,至少包括花朵的正面和侧面视角以及叶片顶视图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb5/6651978/286f8a4b0d08/13007_2019_462_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb5/6651978/286f8a4b0d08/13007_2019_462_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb5/6651978/286f8a4b0d08/13007_2019_462_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Flowers, leaves or both? How to obtain suitable images for automated plant identification.花朵、叶子还是两者兼顾?如何获取适合自动植物识别的图像。
Plant Methods. 2019 Jul 23;15:77. doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0462-4. eCollection 2019.
2
Image-Based Automated Recognition of 31 Poaceae Species: The Most Relevant Perspectives.基于图像的31种禾本科植物自动识别:最相关的视角
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 26;12:804140. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.804140. eCollection 2021.
3
Acquiring and preprocessing leaf images for automated plant identification: understanding the tradeoff between effort and information gain.获取和预处理用于自动植物识别的叶片图像:理解工作量与信息增益之间的权衡。
Plant Methods. 2017 Nov 8;13:97. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0245-8. eCollection 2017.
4
Automated color detection in orchids using color labels and deep learning.利用颜色标签和深度学习技术实现兰花的自动颜色检测。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 27;16(10):e0259036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259036. eCollection 2021.
5
Deep Neural Networks for Automatic Flower Species Localization and Recognition.基于深度神经网络的自动花卉物种定位与识别
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 29;2022:9359353. doi: 10.1155/2022/9359353. eCollection 2022.
6
Plant species classification using flower images-A comparative study of local feature representations.基于花卉图像的植物物种分类——局部特征表示的比较研究
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0170629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170629. eCollection 2017.
7
A Survey of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Applied for Prediction of Plant Leaf Diseases.深度学习卷积神经网络在植物叶片病害预测中的应用综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 12;21(14):4749. doi: 10.3390/s21144749.
8
Flora Capture: a citizen science application for collecting structured plant observations.植物记录:一款用于收集结构化植物观测数据的公民科学应用程序。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec 14;21(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03920-9.
9
MFCIS: an automatic leaf-based identification pipeline for plant cultivars using deep learning and persistent homology.MFCIS:一种基于深度学习和持久同调的用于植物品种自动叶片识别流程
Hortic Res. 2021 Aug 1;8(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00608-w.
10
Weed Growth Stage Estimator Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.基于深度卷积神经网络的杂草生长阶段估算器。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 16;18(5):1580. doi: 10.3390/s18051580.

引用本文的文献

1
Geometric Morphometric Versus Genomic Patterns in a Large Polyploid Plant Species Complex.大型多倍体植物物种复合体中的几何形态测量与基因组模式
Biology (Basel). 2023 Mar 9;12(3):418. doi: 10.3390/biology12030418.
2
Small Leaves, Big Diversity: Citizen Science and Taxonomic Revision Triples Species Number in the Carnivorous Complex ( Section , Droseraceae).小叶,大不同:公民科学与分类学修订使食虫植物复合体(茅膏菜科,茅膏菜属)物种数量增至三倍
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;12(1):141. doi: 10.3390/biology12010141.
3
A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants.

本文引用的文献

1
Image-based classification of plant genus and family for trained and untrained plant species.基于图像的植物属和科分类,适用于训练和未训练的植物物种。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Jan 3;20(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2474-x.
2
Multi-Organ Plant Classification Based on Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks.基于卷积和循环神经网络的多器官植物分类。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 Sep;27(9):4287-4301. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2018.2836321.
3
Automated plant species identification-Trends and future directions.自动化植物物种鉴定——趋势与未来方向。
玫瑰品种分类算法性能比较
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 16;2022:1842547. doi: 10.1155/2022/1842547. eCollection 2022.
4
Automatic detection of alien plant species in action camera images using the chopped picture method and the potential of citizen science.利用裁剪图片法自动检测运动相机图像中的外来植物物种及公民科学的潜力。
Breed Sci. 2022 Mar;72(1):96-106. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.21062. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
5
Deep Learning in Plant Phenological Research: A Systematic Literature Review.植物物候研究中的深度学习:一项系统文献综述
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 17;13:805738. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.805738. eCollection 2022.
6
Identifying and extracting bark key features of 42 tree species using convolutional neural networks and class activation mapping.利用卷积神经网络和类别激活映射技术识别和提取 42 种树的树皮关键特征。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 19;12(1):4772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08571-9.
7
Image-Based Automated Recognition of 31 Poaceae Species: The Most Relevant Perspectives.基于图像的31种禾本科植物自动识别:最相关的视角
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 26;12:804140. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.804140. eCollection 2021.
8
Plant image identification application demonstrates high accuracy in Northern Europe.植物图像识别应用在北欧展现出了很高的准确率。
AoB Plants. 2021 Jul 27;13(4):plab050. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab050. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Citizen science and online data: Opportunities and challenges for snake ecology and action against snakebite.公民科学与在线数据:蛇类生态学及抗蛇咬行动的机遇与挑战
Toxicon X. 2021 Jun 22;9-10:100071. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2021.100071. eCollection 2021 Jul.
10
Supervised Learning Computer Vision Benchmark for Snake Species Identification From Photographs: Implications for Herpetology and Global Health.用于从照片中识别蛇类物种的监督学习计算机视觉基准:对爬虫学和全球健康的影响
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Apr 20;4:582110. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.582110. eCollection 2021.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Apr 5;14(4):e1005993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005993. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Acquiring and preprocessing leaf images for automated plant identification: understanding the tradeoff between effort and information gain.获取和预处理用于自动植物识别的叶片图像:理解工作量与信息增益之间的权衡。
Plant Methods. 2017 Nov 8;13:97. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0245-8. eCollection 2017.
5
Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity.新兴技术保护生物多样性。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov;30(11):685-696. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
A meta-analysis of declines in local species richness from human disturbances.人类干扰导致局部物种丰富度下降的荟萃分析
Ecol Evol. 2014 Jan;4(1):91-103. doi: 10.1002/ece3.909. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
7
A comparison of the strength of biodiversity effects across multiple functions.比较多种功能中生物多样性效应的强度。
Oecologia. 2013 Sep;173(1):223-37. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2589-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
8
The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction.生物多样性在灭绝时代的功能。
Science. 2012 Jun 15;336(6087):1401-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1215855.
9
Complexity of multitrophic interactions in a grassland ecosystem depends on plant species diversity.草原生态系统中多种营养级相互作用的复杂性取决于植物物种多样性。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 May;81(3):614-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01951.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
10
Automated species identification: why not?自动物种识别:为何不呢?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):655-67. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1442.