• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理研究:理论影响的结合。

Nursing research: A marriage of theoretical influences.

作者信息

Jensen Kari Toverud

机构信息

Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2019 Jun 9;6(3):1205-1217. doi: 10.1002/nop2.320. eCollection 2019 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.320
PMID:31367447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6650759/
Abstract

AIM

The aim is to examine PhD theses in nursing science, their purpose or aim and the theoretical approaches and methods employed. The study seeks to examine how such theses may be categorized, what they study, what theoretical approaches they employ and, in particular, to what degree nursing theory is employed as a current theoretical approach.

DESIGN

This study has a descriptive qualitative design.

METHOD

This study complied with the Standard for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). Data were collected from 61 PhD theses in nursing science published from 1994-2015, at University of Edinburgh.

RESULTS

Twenty of the PhD theses used theoretical approaches with a sociological perspective and 12 used a psychological perspective. Eighteen of the PhD theses were based on theoretical approaches from philosophy, ethics, pedagogy, medicine or biology as a primary perspective. Nursing theories, in their conventional definition, have a limited presence in the theses examined.

摘要

目的

旨在审视护理学领域的博士论文,包括其目的或目标以及所采用的理论方法。该研究旨在探究此类论文如何分类、研究内容、采用何种理论方法,尤其是护理学理论作为当前理论方法的应用程度。

设计

本研究采用描述性定性设计。

方法

本研究遵循定性研究报告标准(SRQR)。数据收集自1994年至2015年在爱丁堡大学发表的61篇护理学领域的博士论文。

结果

20篇博士论文采用了社会学视角的理论方法,12篇采用了心理学视角。18篇博士论文以哲学、伦理学、教育学、医学或生物学的理论方法作为主要视角。传统定义下的护理学理论在所审查的论文中应用有限。

相似文献

1
Nursing research: A marriage of theoretical influences.护理研究:理论影响的结合。
Nurs Open. 2019 Jun 9;6(3):1205-1217. doi: 10.1002/nop2.320. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
[Analysis of doctoral theses in nursing science produced in Finland in the years 1982-1987].[1982 - 1987年芬兰护理学博士论文分析]
Hoitotiede. 1990;2(2):158-64.
3
Using a nursing theory or a model in nursing PhD dissertations: a qualitative study from Turkey.
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2015 Apr;26(2):62-72. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12036. Epub 2014 May 28.
4
What factors affect the quality of medical students' doctoral theses? A comparative study in affiliated hospitals of a Chinese university.哪些因素影响医学生博士论文的质量?某中国大学附属医院的一项比较研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 May 14;10:297-302. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S201960. eCollection 2019.
5
Expanding horizons: Lonergan's philosophy as a guide to PhD program pedagogy.拓展视野:作为博士课程教学法指南的隆纳根哲学。
Nurs Outlook. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
A theoretical framework to promote minority PhD and DNP student success in nursing education.促进少数民族护理学博士和护理实践博士学生在护理教育中取得成功的理论框架。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;37(6):1149-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Motivations and challenges of Israeli nurses on their journey to a PhD: A qualitative study.以色列护士攻读博士学位之旅的动机与挑战:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Mar;68:103584. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103584. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
9
The experience of international nursing students studying for a PhD in the U.K: A qualitative study.国际护理专业学生在英国攻读博士学位的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2011 Jun 13;10:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-10-11.
10
An analysis of the productivity and impact of clinical PhD theses from the University of Copenhagen.哥本哈根大学临床博士论文的生产力与影响力分析。
Dan Med J. 2020 May 1;67(5):A12190731.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian nursing specific situation, middle and micro-range theories: a bibliometric study.巴西护理特有情境、中观和微观理论:文献计量研究。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Sep 20;77(4):e20230520. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0520. eCollection 2024.
2
Doctoral programmes in the nursing discipline: a scoping review.护理学科的博士项目:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 15;20(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00753-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: The primacy of the biosciences: a forgotten priority in nurse education?社论:生物科学的首要地位:护理教育中被遗忘的重点?
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Sep;25(17-18):2680-2. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13484. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
2
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
3
Characteristics of quantitative nursing research from 1990 to 2010.1990 年至 2010 年定量护理研究的特点。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013 Dec;45(4):405-11. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12038. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
4
A descriptive study of research published in scientific nursing journals from 1985 to 2010.描述性研究 1985 年至 2010 年发表在科学护理期刊上的研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Sep;49(9):1112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
5
Who uses nursing theory? A univariate descriptive analysis of five years' research articles.谁使用护理理论?对五年研究文章的单变量描述性分析。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2011 Jun;25(2):404-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00835.x. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
6
Emergence of Nordic nursing research: no position is an Island.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):757-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00676.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
7
The nature of nursing research: dissertations in the Nordic countries, 2003.护理研究的本质:北欧国家的博士论文,2003年
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Jun;23(2):402-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00631.x. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
8
Nursing theory and knowledge development: a descriptive review of doctoral dissertations, 2000-2004.护理理论与知识发展:对2000 - 2004年博士论文的描述性综述
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007 Jan-Mar;30(1):E1-14. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00010.
9
Instilling and distilling a reputation for institutional excellence: a critical reflection on organising practice.灌输并提炼卓越机构的声誉:对组织实践的批判性反思。
J Health Organ Manag. 2005;19(6):440-65. doi: 10.1108/14777260510629643.
10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.