• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

54000个荷兰语单词的识别时间:来自荷兰众包项目的数据。

Recognition Times for 54 Thousand Dutch Words: Data from the Dutch Crowdsourcing Project.

作者信息

Brysbaert Marc, Keuleers Emmanuel, Mandera Paweł

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, BE.

Department Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, NL.

出版信息

Psychol Belg. 2019 Jul 17;59(1):281-300. doi: 10.5334/pb.491.

DOI:10.5334/pb.491
PMID:31367458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6659767/
Abstract

We present a new database of Dutch word recognition times for a total of 54 thousand words, called the Dutch Crowdsourcing Project. The data were collected with an internet vocabulary test. The database is limited to native Dutch speakers. Participants were asked to indicate which words they knew. Their response times were registered, even though the participants were not asked to respond as fast as possible. Still, the response times correlate around .7 with the response times of the Dutch Lexicon Projects for shared words. Also results of virtual experiments indicate that the new response times are a valid addition to the Dutch Lexicon Projects. This not only means that we have useful response times for some 20 thousand extra words, but we now also have data on differences in response latencies as a function of education and age. The new data correspond better to word use in the Netherlands.

摘要

我们展示了一个新的荷兰语单词识别时间数据库,其中包含总共54000个单词,称为荷兰众包项目。这些数据是通过互联网词汇测试收集的。该数据库仅限于以荷兰语为母语的人。参与者被要求指出他们认识哪些单词。他们的反应时间被记录下来,尽管没有要求参与者尽可能快地做出反应。尽管如此,对于共享单词,这些反应时间与荷兰词汇项目的反应时间的相关性约为0.7。虚拟实验的结果也表明,新的反应时间是对荷兰词汇项目的有效补充。这不仅意味着我们有了约20000个额外单词的有用反应时间,而且我们现在还拥有了关于反应潜伏期差异随教育程度和年龄变化的数据。新数据与荷兰的单词使用情况更相符。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/c57e4eb11560/pb-59-1-491-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/a73acacc128b/pb-59-1-491-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/299459182b8c/pb-59-1-491-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/3c26de0cce62/pb-59-1-491-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/3152fa471e23/pb-59-1-491-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/adbced92018f/pb-59-1-491-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/c57e4eb11560/pb-59-1-491-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/a73acacc128b/pb-59-1-491-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/299459182b8c/pb-59-1-491-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/3c26de0cce62/pb-59-1-491-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/3152fa471e23/pb-59-1-491-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/adbced92018f/pb-59-1-491-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/6659767/c57e4eb11560/pb-59-1-491-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
Recognition Times for 54 Thousand Dutch Words: Data from the Dutch Crowdsourcing Project.54000个荷兰语单词的识别时间:来自荷兰众包项目的数据。
Psychol Belg. 2019 Jul 17;59(1):281-300. doi: 10.5334/pb.491.
2
Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project.识别 62000 个英语单词所需的时间:来自英语众包项目的数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):741-760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8.
3
Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: a lexical decision study on 14,000 dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords.大规模视觉词汇识别研究中的练习效应:对 14000 个荷兰单音节和双音节词和非词的词汇判断研究。
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 18;1:174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174. eCollection 2010.
4
The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.词频对词汇判断时间的影响:来自荷兰词汇项目2的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):441-58. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000159. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words.《汉语词汇项目:对25000多个繁体中文双字复合词的词汇判断表现的大规模研究》
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1503-1519. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0810-5.
6
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.62000 个英语词汇的词频规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):467-479. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9.
7
How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy.西班牙语使用者如何阅读单词?一项众包词汇判断巨量研究的启示。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):1867-1882. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01357-9.
8
Prevalence norms for 40,777 Catalan words: An online megastudy of vocabulary size.40777 个加泰罗尼亚语单词的使用频率规范:词汇量的在线巨量研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):3198-3217. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01959-5. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
9
Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment.群体中的词汇知识:在一项大规模在线实验中测量词汇量和词汇流行度
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1665-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.30000 个英语单词的习得年龄评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages.吉瓦尔:一个包含40种语言的词邻域度量的数据库和计算器。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 19;57(3):98. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02612-7.
2
The Italian Crowdsourcing Project: Visual word recognition times for 130,495 Italian words.意大利众包项目:130495个意大利语单词的视觉单词识别时间
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):26. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02548-4.
3
Ratings of valence, arousal, happiness, anger, fear, sadness, disgust, and surprise for 24,000 Dutch words.

本文引用的文献

1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
The Danger of Testing by Selecting Controlled Subsets, with Applications to Spoken-Word Recognition.通过选择受控子集进行测试的风险及其在语音识别中的应用
J Cogn. 2019 Jan 24;2(1):2. doi: 10.5334/joc.51.
3
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.混合效应模型中的功效分析与效应量:教程
24,000 个荷兰单词的效价、唤醒度、幸福感、愤怒感、恐惧感、悲伤感、厌恶感和惊讶感的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):5023-5039. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02239-6. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
Dutch sensory modality norms.荷兰感觉模式规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1306-1318. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01656-9. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 12;1(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.10.
4
Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project.识别 62000 个英语单词所需的时间:来自英语众包项目的数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):741-760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8.
5
How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations.词识别测量的相关性如何?语言语境和重复呈现的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2800-2816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1158-9.
6
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.62000 个英语词汇的词频规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):467-479. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9.
7
Vocabulary Knowledge Predicts Lexical Processing: Evidence from a Group of Participants with Diverse Educational Backgrounds.词汇知识可预测词汇处理:来自一群具有不同教育背景参与者的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 13;8:1164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01164. eCollection 2017.
8
Reading through the life span: Individual differences in psycholinguistic effects.贯穿一生的阅读:心理语言学效应中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Aug;43(8):1298-1338. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000366. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis.通过多元宇宙分析提高透明度。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):702-712. doi: 10.1177/1745691616658637.
10
How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant's Age.我们认识多少单词?基于单词定义、语言输入程度和参与者年龄的词汇量实际估算
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 29;7:1116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116. eCollection 2016.