• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别 62000 个英语单词所需的时间:来自英语众包项目的数据。

Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):741-760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8
PMID:31368025
Abstract

We present a new dataset of English word recognition times for a total of 62 thousand words, called the English Crowdsourcing Project. The data were collected via an internet vocabulary test in which more than one million people participated. The present dataset is limited to native English speakers. Participants were asked to indicate which words they knew. Their response times were registered, although at no point were the participants asked to respond as quickly as possible. Still, the response times correlate around .75 with the response times of the English Lexicon Project for the shared words. Also, the results of virtual experiments indicate that the new response times are a valid addition to the English Lexicon Project. This not only means that we have useful response times for some 35 thousand extra words, but we now also have data on differences in response latencies as a function of education and age.

摘要

我们呈现了一个新的英文单词识别时间数据集,总共有 62000 个单词,称为英文众包项目。这些数据是通过一个互联网词汇测试收集的,有超过一百万人参与。目前这个数据集仅限于以英语为母语的人。参与者被要求指出他们认识的单词。他们的反应时间被记录下来,尽管在任何时候都没有要求参与者尽快做出反应。尽管如此,反应时间与英语词汇项目中共享单词的反应时间的相关性约为 0.75。此外,虚拟实验的结果表明,新的反应时间是对英语词汇项目的有效补充。这不仅意味着我们有大约 35000 个额外单词的有用反应时间,而且我们现在还有关于反应时差异的教育和年龄的相关数据。

相似文献

1
Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project.识别 62000 个英语单词所需的时间:来自英语众包项目的数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):741-760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8.
2
Recognition Times for 54 Thousand Dutch Words: Data from the Dutch Crowdsourcing Project.54000个荷兰语单词的识别时间:来自荷兰众包项目的数据。
Psychol Belg. 2019 Jul 17;59(1):281-300. doi: 10.5334/pb.491.
3
How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy.西班牙语使用者如何阅读单词?一项众包词汇判断巨量研究的启示。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):1867-1882. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01357-9.
4
Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.30000 个英语单词的习得年龄评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4.
5
The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.英国词汇项目:28730 个单音节和双音节英语单词的词汇判断数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):287-304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4.
6
The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words.《汉语词汇项目:对25000多个繁体中文双字复合词的词汇判断表现的大规模研究》
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1503-1519. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0810-5.
7
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.62000 个英语词汇的词频规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):467-479. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9.
8
Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment.群体中的词汇知识:在一项大规模在线实验中测量词汇量和词汇流行度
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1665-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
10
A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.629 个英语复合词数据库:熟悉度评分、词元意义主导性、语义透明度、习得年龄、形象性和感官体验。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1004-1019. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0523-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Specificity effect in concrete/abstract semantic categorization task.具体/抽象语义分类任务中的特异性效应
Cogn Process. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01286-5.
2
Reward as a facet of word meaning: Ratings of motivation for 8,601 English words.作为词义一个方面的奖赏:对8601个英语单词的动机评级
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 29;57(9):242. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02762-8.
3
Cognition ratings for 8826 english words.8826个英语单词的认知评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 29;57(7):181. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02663-w.
4
English verbs semantic norms database: Concreteness, embodiment, imageability, valence and arousal ratings for 3,500 verbs.英语动词语义规范数据库:3500个动词的具体性、体现性、形象性、效价和唤醒评级
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 23;57(5):153. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02675-6.
5
Item-Level Analysis of Category Fluency Test Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies of Normal and Neurologically Abnormal Ageing.类别流畅性测试表现的项目水平分析:对正常和神经学异常衰老研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09657-z.
6
Moving beyond word frequency based on tally counting: AI-generated familiarity estimates of words and phrases are an interesting additional index of language knowledge.超越基于计数的词频:人工智能生成的单词和短语熟悉度估计是语言知识的一个有趣的附加指标。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):28. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02561-7.
7
The Italian Crowdsourcing Project: Visual word recognition times for 130,495 Italian words.意大利众包项目:130495个意大利语单词的视觉单词识别时间
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):26. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02548-4.
8
Specificity ratings for English data.英文数据的特异性评级。
Cogn Process. 2025 May;26(2):283-302. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01239-4. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
9
Revealing hidden interactions in mean performance through distributional analyses: Evidence from Chinese lexical decision performance.通过分布分析揭示平均表现中的隐藏交互作用:来自中文词汇判断表现的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1274-1283. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02609-x. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
10
How does emotional content influence visual word recognition? A meta-analysis of valence effects.情绪内容如何影响视觉单词识别?一项关于效价效应的元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):570-587. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02555-8. Epub 2024 Sep 19.