• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词频对词汇判断时间的影响:来自荷兰词汇项目2的证据

The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.

作者信息

Brysbaert Marc, Stevens Michaël, Mandera Paweł, Keuleers Emmanuel

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):441-58. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000159. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000159
PMID:26501839
Abstract

Keuleers, Stevens, Mandera, and Brysbaert (2015) presented a new variable, word prevalence, defined as word knowledge in the population. Some words are known to more people than other. This is particularly true for low-frequency words (e.g., screenshot vs. scourage). In the present study, we examined the impact of the measure by collecting lexical decision times for 30,000 Dutch word lemmas of various lengths (the Dutch Lexicon Project 2). Word prevalence had the second highest correlation with lexical decision times (after word frequency): Words known by everyone in the population were responded to 100 ms faster than words known to only half of the population, even after controlling for word frequency, word length, age of acquisition, similarity to other words, and concreteness. Because word prevalence has rather low correlations with the existing measures (including word frequency), the unique variance it contributes to lexical decision times is higher than that of the other variables. We consider the reasons why word prevalence has an impact on word processing times and we argue that it is likely to be the most important new variable protecting researchers against experimenter bias in selecting stimulus materials.

摘要

凯勒斯、史蒂文斯、曼德拉和布里斯巴特(2015年)提出了一个新变量——词频,定义为人群中的词汇知识。有些词比其他词为更多人所知。对于低频词来说尤其如此(例如,“屏幕截图”与“鞭笞”)。在本研究中,我们通过收集30000个不同长度的荷兰语词元(荷兰语词汇项目2)的词汇判断时间,来检验该测量方法的影响。词频与词汇判断时间的相关性仅次于词频:即使在控制了词频、词长、习得年龄、与其他词的相似度和具体性之后,人群中每个人都知道的词的反应速度比只有一半人知道的词快100毫秒。由于词频与现有测量方法(包括词频)的相关性相当低,它对词汇判断时间的独特方差贡献高于其他变量。我们思考了词频对词汇处理时间产生影响的原因,并认为它很可能是保护研究人员在选择刺激材料时免受实验者偏差影响的最重要的新变量。

相似文献

1
The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.词频对词汇判断时间的影响:来自荷兰词汇项目2的证据
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):441-58. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000159. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
2
A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.英语词汇判断任务表现中词频和习得年龄效应的进一步考察:频率轨迹的作用
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):82-96. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000564. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
3
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.单词阅读时间和词汇判断时间的相关性有多强?结合来自眼动语料库和大型研究的数据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
4
Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?主观频率和习得年龄的影响在更好的词频规范下是否依然存在?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Mar;64(3):545-59. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.503374. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
5
Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment.群体中的词汇知识:在一项大规模在线实验中测量词汇量和词汇流行度
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1665-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.频率轨迹会影响单词识别吗?一项跨任务比较。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):973-1000. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.723725. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
7
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.幸存的盲目分解:复杂单词识别时间进程的分布分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.卡尔加里语义决策项目:一万个英语单词的具体/抽象决策数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):407-417. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0720-6.
9
Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words.超过 5000 个单音节和双音节词的感觉体验评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):160-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0242-9.
10
Tangible words are recognized faster: the grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems.具体的词汇能被更快地识别:意义在感觉和知觉系统中的扎根。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Sep;64(9):1683-91. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605150.

引用本文的文献

1
Unaware processing of words activates experience-derived information in conceptual-semantic brain networks.单词的无意识加工会激活概念语义脑网络中源自经验的信息。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Feb 26;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00484. eCollection 2025.
2
Simplified Chinese lexicon project: A lexical decision database with 8105 characters and 4864 pseudocharacters.简体中文字典项目:一个包含8105个汉字和4864个假字的词汇判断数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jun 23;57(7):206. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02701-7.
3
Cognition ratings for 8826 english words.
8826个英语单词的认知评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 29;57(7):181. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02663-w.
4
The German Auditory and Image (GAudI) vocabulary test: A new German receptive vocabulary test and its relationships to other tests measuring linguistic experience.德国听觉与图像(GAudI)词汇测试:一项新的德语接受性词汇测试及其与其他衡量语言经验的测试之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0318115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318115. eCollection 2025.
5
Lexical decision times for nouns from the Croatian Psycholinguistic Database.来自克罗地亚心理语言学数据库的名词的词汇判断时间。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 25;57(6):156. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02676-5.
6
Individual differences in associative/semantic priming: Spreading of activation in semantic memory and epistemically unwarranted beliefs.联想/语义启动中的个体差异:语义记忆中的激活扩散与认知上无根据的信念。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):e0313239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313239. eCollection 2025.
7
The Italian Crowdsourcing Project: Visual word recognition times for 130,495 Italian words.意大利众包项目:130495个意大利语单词的视觉单词识别时间
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):26. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02548-4.
8
Lexical innovations are rarely passed on during one's lifetime: Epidemiological perspectives on estimating the basic reproductive ratio of words.词汇创新在一个人的一生中很少会传承下去:关于估计词汇基本繁殖率的流行病学观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0312336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312336. eCollection 2024.
9
A dataset of subjective frequency estimates of the words of the peabody vocabulary test by Arabic-English bilingual speakers.一个由阿拉伯语-英语双语者对皮博迪词汇测试中的单词进行主观频率估计的数据集。
Data Brief. 2024 Oct 22;57:111056. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.111056. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Age-adapted painting descriptions change the viewing behavior of young visitors to the Rijksmuseum.年龄适配的画作描述改变了年轻参观者参观荷兰国立博物馆的行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):22880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73963-y.