• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪内容如何影响视觉单词识别?一项关于效价效应的元分析。

How does emotional content influence visual word recognition? A meta-analysis of valence effects.

作者信息

Ferré Pilar, Sánchez-Carmona Alberto J, Haro Juan, Calvillo-Torres Rocío, Albert Jacobo, Hinojosa José Antonio

机构信息

Departament de Psicologia and CRAMC, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

Centro Neuromottiva, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):570-587. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02555-8. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-024-02555-8
PMID:39299963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12000208/
Abstract

Research on the interplay between language and emotion has shown evidence that the affective content of words influences their recognition. However, the direction of the effects is not clear, as there are mixed findings regarding the role of positive and, especially, negative valence. We conducted a Bayesian multi-level meta-analysis to examine the role of valence in visual word recognition, focusing on the lexical decision task. The results revealed a facilitative effect of positive valence on lexical decision times. That is, positive words led to faster responses than both negative and neutral words. In contrast, negative valence did not have any effect, although the analysis of several moderator variables suggested that there might be a facilitative effect in some cases, specifically, when negative words elicit very strong and intense emotions. These results shed light on the complexities of emotional word processing. They also point to the need for psycholinguistic models to take affective information into account, and thus provide a complete view of visual word recognition.

摘要

关于语言与情感之间相互作用的研究表明,单词的情感内容会影响其识别。然而,这种影响的方向并不明确,因为关于正性尤其是负性效价的作用存在不一致的研究结果。我们进行了一项贝叶斯多层次元分析,以检验效价在视觉单词识别中的作用,重点关注词汇判断任务。结果显示正性效价对词汇判断时间有促进作用。也就是说,与负性和中性单词相比,正性单词能带来更快的反应。相比之下,负性效价没有任何影响,不过对几个调节变量的分析表明,在某些情况下可能存在促进作用,具体而言,当负性单词引发非常强烈和激烈的情绪时。这些结果揭示了情感词汇加工的复杂性。它们还指出心理语言学模型需要考虑情感信息,从而提供视觉单词识别的完整观点。

相似文献

1
How does emotional content influence visual word recognition? A meta-analysis of valence effects.情绪内容如何影响视觉单词识别?一项关于效价效应的元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):570-587. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02555-8. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task.效价和唤醒对情绪词汇加工的影响受具体性调节:来自词汇判断任务的行为和事件相关电位证据
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Dec;110:231-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.07.499. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
3
The graded effect of valence on word recognition in Spanish.西班牙语中效价对单词识别的分级效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):851-868. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000616. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
4
Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition.情感与语言:效价和唤醒水平影响单词识别。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1065-1081. doi: 10.1037/a0035669. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
5
[The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].[语义丰富度对情绪词汇视觉识别的影响]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):70-8. doi: 10.1037/a0027083.
6
Emotion from the sound of a word: Statistical relationships between surface form and valence of English words influence lexical access and memory.从单词的声音中产生的情绪:英语单词的表面形式和情感之间的统计关系影响词汇的获取和记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Dec;152(12):3566-3593. doi: 10.1037/xge0001477. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
The Influence of Negative Orthographic Neighborhood in the Lexical Decision Task: Valence and Arousal Contributions.负正字邻接在词汇判断任务中的影响:效价和唤醒度的贡献。
Lang Speech. 2022 Sep;65(3):740-754. doi: 10.1177/00238309211061090. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
The role of individual differences in emotional word recognition: Insights from a large-scale lexical decision study.个体差异在情绪词汇识别中的作用:来自大规模词汇判断研究的启示。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8501-8520. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02488-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
9
The influence of emotion on lexical processing: insights from RT distributional analysis.情绪对词汇加工的影响:来自反应时分布分析的见解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):526-33. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0525-x.
10
Somatic and visceral effects of word valence, arousal and concreteness in a continuum lexical space.在连续词汇空间中,单词的积极度、唤醒度和具体度对躯体和内脏的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56382-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of individual differences in the processing of words expressing discrete emotions: data from a large-scale study.表达离散情绪的词汇加工中个体差异的影响:来自一项大规模研究的数据。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10310-9.
2
Mapping Contributions of the Anterior Temporal Semantic Hub to the Processing of Abstract and Concrete Verbs.绘制颞前叶语义中枢对抽象动词和具体动词加工的贡献
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Apr 15;46(6):e70210. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70210.
3
The Flexible Role of Social Experience in the Processing of Abstract Concepts.

本文引用的文献

1
Selecting relevant moderators with Bayesian regularized meta-regression.使用贝叶斯正则化元回归选择相关调节变量。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Mar;14(2):301-322. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1628. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
2
Mathematical and Negative Information Are Similarly Processed: Pupil Dilation as an Indicator.数学信息和负面信息的处理方式相似:瞳孔扩张作为一个指标。
J Intell. 2022 Oct 3;10(4):79. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040079.
3
Robust Bayesian meta-analysis: Model-averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods.稳健贝叶斯荟萃分析:跨越互补性发表偏倚调整方法的模型平均。
社会经验在抽象概念加工中的灵活作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;15(2):190. doi: 10.3390/bs15020190.
Res Synth Methods. 2023 Jan;14(1):99-116. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1594. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
A multilevel Bayesian meta-analysis of the body inversion effect: Evaluating controversies over headless and sexualized bodies.多层次贝叶斯元分析的身体反转效应:评估无头和性化身体的争议。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1558-1593. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02067-3. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Unraveling the Mystery About the Negative Valence Bias: Does Arousal Account for Processing Differences in Unpleasant Words?揭开负性情绪偏向之谜:唤醒水平能否解释不愉快词汇加工差异?
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 2;12:748726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748726. eCollection 2021.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
7
The influence of word valence on the right visual field advantage in the VHF paradigm: time to adjust the expectations.词的褒贬义对 VHF 范式中右视野优势的影响:调整预期的时间。
Laterality. 2020 Sep;25(5):537-559. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2020.1736091. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
8
Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.映射语义空间:属性规范与语义丰富度
Cogn Process. 2020 Nov;21(4):637-649. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00933-y. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project.识别 62000 个英语单词所需的时间:来自英语众包项目的数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):741-760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8.
10
SPALEX: A Spanish Lexical Decision Database From a Massive Online Data Collection.SPALEX:一个源自大规模在线数据收集的西班牙语词汇判断数据库。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02156. eCollection 2018.