McCann Lisa, McMillan Kathryn Anne, Pugh Gemma
Digital Health and Wellness Group, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
JMIR Cancer. 2019 Jul 31;5(2):e12071. doi: 10.2196/12071.
The last decade has seen an increase in the number of digital health interventions designed to support adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer.
The objective of this review was to identify, characterize, and fully assess the quality, feasibility, and efficacy of existing digital health interventions developed specifically for AYAs, aged between 13 and 39 years, living with or beyond a cancer diagnosis.
Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify digital health interventions designed specifically for AYA living with or beyond a cancer diagnosis. Data on the characteristics and outcomes of each intervention were synthesized.
A total of 4731 intervention studies were identified through the searches; 38 interventions (43 research papers) met the inclusion criteria. Most (20/38, 53%) were website-based interventions. Most studies focused on symptom management and medication adherence (15, 39%), behavior change (15, 39%), self-care (8, 21%), and emotional health (7, 18%). Most digital health interventions included multiple automated and communicative functions such as enriched information environments, automated follow-up messages, and access to peer support. Where reported (20, 53% of studies), AYAs' subjective experience of using the digital platform was typically positive. The overall quality of the studies was found to be good (mean Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields scores >68%). Some studies reported feasibility outcomes (uptake, acceptability, and attrition) but were not sufficiently powered to comment on intervention effects.
Numerous digital interventions have been developed and designed to support young people living with and beyond a diagnosis of cancer. However, many of these interventions have yet to be deployed, implemented, and evaluated at scale.
在过去十年中,旨在支持患有癌症的青少年和青年(AYAs)的数字健康干预措施数量有所增加。
本综述的目的是识别、描述并全面评估专门为年龄在13至39岁之间、已确诊或仍在与癌症抗争的AYAs开发的现有数字健康干预措施的质量、可行性和有效性。
在PubMed、EMBASE和科学网进行检索,以识别专门为已确诊或仍在与癌症抗争的AYA设计的数字健康干预措施。对每项干预措施的特征和结果数据进行了综合分析。
通过检索共识别出4731项干预研究;38项干预措施(43篇研究论文)符合纳入标准。大多数(20/38,53%)是基于网站的干预措施。大多数研究集中在症状管理和药物依从性(15项,39%)、行为改变(15项,39%)、自我护理(8项,21%)和情绪健康(7项,18%)方面。大多数数字健康干预措施包括多种自动化和交流功能,如丰富的信息环境、自动跟进信息以及获得同伴支持。在有报告的情况下(20项研究,占53%),AYAs使用数字平台的主观体验通常是积极的。研究的总体质量被认为良好(来自各个领域的评估初级研究论文的平均质量评估标准得分>68%)。一些研究报告了可行性结果(采用率、可接受性和损耗率),但样本量不足以对干预效果发表评论。
已经开发并设计了许多数字干预措施来支持患有癌症以及癌症康复后的年轻人。然而,这些干预措施中的许多尚未大规模部署、实施和评估。