Suppr超能文献

青年成年人的体重管理:电子健康干预组件与结果的系统评价

Weight Management in Young Adults: Systematic Review of Electronic Health Intervention Components and Outcomes.

作者信息

Willmott Taylor Jade, Pang Bo, Rundle-Thiele Sharyn, Badejo Abi

机构信息

Social Marketing @ Griffith, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 6;21(2):e10265. doi: 10.2196/10265.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Young adulthood is a vulnerable period for unhealthy lifestyle adoption and excess weight gain. Scant attention has been focused on developing and evaluating effective weight gain prevention strategies for this age group. Electronic health (eHealth) offers potential as a cost-effective means of delivering convenient, individually-tailored, and contextually-meaningful interventions at scale.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this systematic review was to locate and synthesize the evidence on eHealth weight management interventions targeting young adults, with a particular focus on (eHealth) intervention components and outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy was executed across the following electronic databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, EMBASE, Emerald, Education Resources Information Center, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Ovid, ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science. Furthermore, 2 reviewers independently assessed records for eligibility: peer-reviewed, published in English, and report evaluations of eHealth weight management interventions targeting healthy young adults (aged 18-35 years). Data were then extracted from studies that met the criteria for inclusion. The methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by 2 reviewers using the Effective Public Health Practice Project's (EPHPP) quality assessment tool. A comprehensive narrative evidence synthesis was then completed.

RESULTS

Out of the 1301 studies assessed for eligibility, 24 met the criteria for inclusion. According to the EPHPP quality assessment tool, overall, 19 studies were as rated weak, 5 as moderate, and none as strong. The narrative synthesis of intervention outcomes found 8 studies reported positive weight-related outcomes, 4 reported mixed outcomes, and 12 did not report any significant changes in weight-related outcomes. The narrative synthesis of (eHealth) intervention components led to 3 levels of classification. A total of 14 studies were classified as Web-based, 3 as mobile-based, and 7 as multicomponent interventions. Following the narrative synthesis, 5 key strategies were thematically identified: self-regulation (goal setting and self-monitoring), tailored or personalized feedback, contact with an interventionist, social support, and behavioral prompts (nudges and reminders) and booster messages.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight the limited evidence base for eHealth weight management interventions targeting young adults. The complex nature of weight management presents an ongoing challenge for interventionists to identify what works, for whom, how, and when. The quality of the evidence in this review was generally assessed as weak; however, assessment tools such as the EPHPP are principally concerned with what should be and this is seldom equivalent to what works. Thus, while sampling, study design and retention rates will remain key determining factors of reliability and validity, further research attention directed toward the development of guiding tools for community trials is warranted.

摘要

背景

青年期是采用不健康生活方式和体重过度增加的脆弱时期。针对这一年龄组制定和评估有效的体重增加预防策略的关注较少。电子健康(eHealth)作为一种具有成本效益的手段,有潜力大规模提供方便、个性化且具有情境意义的干预措施。

目的

本系统评价的主要目的是查找和综合针对青年成年人的电子健康体重管理干预措施的证据,特别关注(电子健康)干预组成部分和结果。

方法

根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行系统评价。搜索策略在以下电子数据库中执行:护理及相关健康文献累积索引、考克兰图书馆、EBSCO、EMBASE、Emerald、教育资源信息中心、医学文献分析与联机检索系统、Ovid、ProQuest、PsycINFO、PubMed、科学Direct、Scopus和科学网。此外,两名评审员独立评估记录的资格:同行评审、英文发表,并报告针对健康青年成年人(18 - 35岁)的电子健康体重管理干预措施的评价。然后从符合纳入标准的研究中提取数据。两名评审员使用有效公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)质量评估工具独立评估研究的方法质量。然后完成全面的叙述性证据综合。

结果

在评估资格的1301项研究中,24项符合纳入标准。根据EPHPP质量评估工具,总体而言,19项研究被评为弱质量,5项为中等质量,没有一项为强质量。干预结果的叙述性综合发现,8项研究报告了与体重相关的积极结果,4项报告了混合结果,12项未报告体重相关结果有任何显著变化。(电子健康)干预组成部分的叙述性综合导致了三个分类级别。共有14项研究被归类为基于网络的,3项为基于移动设备的,7项为多成分干预。在叙述性综合之后,主题性地确定了5项关键策略:自我调节(目标设定和自我监测)、量身定制或个性化反馈、与干预者接触、社会支持以及行为提示(推动和提醒)和强化信息。

结论

研究结果突出了针对青年成年人的电子健康体重管理干预措施的证据基础有限。体重管理的复杂性给干预者带来了持续的挑战,即确定什么有效、对谁有效、如何有效以及何时有效。本综述中的证据质量总体被评估为薄弱;然而,诸如EPHPP之类的评估工具主要关注应该是什么,而这很少等同于实际有效的情况。因此,虽然抽样、研究设计和保留率仍将是可靠性和有效性的关键决定因素,但有必要将更多的研究注意力转向开发社区试验的指导工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9691/6381405/d967bc0a4276/jmir_v21i2e10265_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验