Higashihara J, Saito T, Berens M E, Welander C E
Section on Gynecologic Oncology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27103.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1988;22(3):215-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00273414.
Effects of combination treatment with human recombinant alpha-2b interferon (IFN-alpha 2b) and gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) and sequencing of the combination on colony formation of human tumor cells were studied in a human tumor clonogenic assay (HTCA) with or without ascites-associated macrophages (AAM). Five different human tumor cell lines were studied. Three of the five cell lines (ovarian cancer cell line BG-1, cervical cancer cell line ME-180, and melanoma cell line SK-MEL 28) were sensitive to both IFNs. Cervical cancer cell line CaSki was sensitive to IFN-alpha 2b but resistant to IFN-gamma. Endometrial cancer cell line HEC-1A was resistant to both IFNs. Synergistic interaction was observed in BG-1 and SK-MEL 28 with a combination of the IFNs. ME-180 did not exhibit a positive interaction, in spite of its sensitivity to each IFN. CaSki and HEC-1A also did not exhibit a positive combined interaction at clinically achievable concentrations. One sequential combination method (method 1: IFN-alpha 2b----IFN gamma with a 24-h interval) resulted in a similar antitumor effect as the simultaneous combination. A reversed sequential method (method 2: IFN-gamma----IFN-alpha 2b with a 24-h interval) was less effective in three of the five cell lines. In BG-1, AAM enclosed in the lower layer markedly enhanced the antitumor effect of combined IFNs as well as each IFN alone. The antitumor effect with method 1 was significantly greater than that achieved with simultaneous combination or combination according to method 2 in the presence of AAM (P less than 0.01). These results suggest that (1) a synergistic antitumor effect of IFN-alpha 2b and IFN gamma is demonstrable in selected types of tumors, depending upon the sensitivity of each tumor cell line to both IFNs; (2) optimal scheduling for the direct antitumor effect of combined IFNs seems to be long-term exposure of cells to the IFN, the cells being treated with both IFNs either simultaneously or sequentially (IFN-alpha 2b preceding IFN-gamma); and (3) AAM potentiate the antitumor effect of IFNs either alone or in combination. Finally, IFN-alpha 2b may have some priming effects for the indirect effect of IFN gamma mediated through AAM in certain tumor cells.
在有或无腹水相关巨噬细胞(AAM)的人肿瘤克隆形成试验(HTCA)中,研究了重组人α-2b干扰素(IFN-α 2b)和γ干扰素(IFN-γ)联合治疗对人肿瘤细胞集落形成的影响以及联合用药顺序的影响。研究了五种不同的人肿瘤细胞系。五个细胞系中的三个(卵巢癌细胞系BG-1、宫颈癌细胞系ME-180和黑色素瘤细胞系SK-MEL 28)对两种干扰素均敏感。宫颈癌细胞系CaSki对IFN-α 2b敏感,但对IFN-γ耐药。子宫内膜癌细胞系HEC-1A对两种干扰素均耐药。在BG-1和SK-MEL 28中观察到两种干扰素联合使用具有协同作用。尽管ME-180对每种干扰素敏感,但未表现出阳性相互作用。在临床可达到的浓度下,CaSki和HEC-1A也未表现出阳性联合相互作用。一种序贯联合方法(方法1:IFN-α 2b→IFN-γ,间隔24小时)产生的抗肿瘤效果与同时联合使用相似。一种反向序贯方法(方法2:IFN-γ→IFN-α 2b,间隔24小时)在五个细胞系中的三个中效果较差。在BG-1中,下层包裹的AAM显著增强了联合干扰素以及每种干扰素单独使用时的抗肿瘤效果。在有AAM存在的情况下,方法1的抗肿瘤效果显著大于同时联合使用或方法2联合使用所达到的效果(P<0.01)。这些结果表明:(1)IFN-α 2b和IFN-γ的协同抗肿瘤作用在某些类型的肿瘤中是可证明的,但取决于每种肿瘤细胞系对两种干扰素的敏感性;(2)联合干扰素直接抗肿瘤作用的最佳给药方案似乎是使细胞长期暴露于干扰素,细胞同时或序贯(IFN-α 2b先于IFN-γ)接受两种干扰素治疗;(3)AAM可增强干扰素单独或联合使用时的抗肿瘤作用。最后,在某些肿瘤细胞中,IFN-α 2b可能对IFN-γ通过AAM介导的间接作用有一些启动作用。