Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 20;116(34):16799-16804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902926116. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
There is now recognition that a population's overall level of well-being is defined not just by income and wealth. Where we live and who we interact with are likely to be equally important in our overall levels of satisfaction with our lives. This thinking has stimulated studies of subjective well-being, or happiness, at both national and local scales. These studies suggest that where you live does matter, although it is health and family status that have the most direct effects on well-being. In this study, we use a detailed dataset on well-being from the China Household Finance Survey to reexamine well-being across China, where profound socioeconomic changes are taking place. The study controls for self-reported health and examines subjective well-being across extensive and varied Chinese urban and rural environments. We find that the earlier pessimism about China's well-being, which emphasized declining happiness, may be misplaced. We make two contributions: first, we show a rising level of subjective well-being, and second, we show that there is a narrowing gap in well-being across different social indicators. Methodologically, we bring in the perspectives of both social capital and geographic context.
现在人们认识到,一个人群的整体幸福感不仅取决于收入和财富。我们生活的地方和我们与之互动的人,在我们对生活的总体满意度方面可能同样重要。这种思维方式激发了对主观幸福感(或幸福)的研究,包括国家和地方层面的研究。这些研究表明,你居住的地方确实很重要,尽管健康和家庭状况对幸福感的直接影响最大。在这项研究中,我们使用中国家庭金融调查的详细幸福感数据集,重新审视中国各地正在发生的深刻社会经济变化对幸福感的影响。该研究控制了自我报告的健康状况,并在广泛多样的中国城乡环境中考察了主观幸福感。我们发现,早些时候对中国幸福感的悲观情绪,强调幸福感下降,可能是错误的。我们做出了两个贡献:首先,我们展示了主观幸福感的上升水平;其次,我们表明,不同社会指标的幸福感差距正在缩小。在方法论上,我们引入了社会资本和地理背景的观点。