Abel Guy J, Muttarak Raya, Bordone Valeria, Zagheni Emilio
1Asian Demographic Research Institute (ADRI), Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
2Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (IIASA, VID/ÖAW, WU), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg, 2361 Austria.
Eur J Popul. 2018 Jun 18;35(3):543-562. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9493-1. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Studies of collaborative networks of demographers are relatively scarce. Similar studies in other social sciences provide insight into scholarly trends of both the fields and characteristics of their successful scientists. Exploiting a unique database of metadata for papers presented at six European Population Conferences, this report explores factors explaining research collaboration among demographers. We find that (1) collaboration among demographers has increased over the past 10 years, however, among co-authored papers, collaboration across institutions remains relatively unchanged over the period, (2) papers based on core demographic subfields such as fertility, mortality, migration and data and methods are more likely to involve multiple authors and (3) multiple author teams that are all female are less likely to co-author with colleagues in different institutions. Potential explanations for these results are discussed alongside comparisons with similar studies of collaboration networks in other related social sciences.
关于人口统计学家合作网络的研究相对较少。其他社会科学领域的类似研究有助于洞察这些领域的学术趋势以及成功科学家的特征。本报告利用一个独特的数据库,该数据库包含在六次欧洲人口会议上发表的论文的元数据,探讨了解释人口统计学家之间研究合作的因素。我们发现:(1)在过去10年里,人口统计学家之间的合作有所增加,然而,在合著论文中,机构间的合作在此期间相对保持不变;(2)基于生育、死亡率、移民以及数据和方法等核心人口统计学子领域的论文更有可能涉及多位作者;(3)全由女性组成的多作者团队与不同机构的同事共同撰写论文的可能性较小。在与其他相关社会科学领域合作网络的类似研究进行比较的同时,还讨论了这些结果的潜在解释。