Suppr超能文献

用于紧急健康问题的数字和在线症状检查器以及健康评估/分诊服务:系统评价

Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review.

作者信息

Chambers Duncan, Cantrell Anna J, Johnson Maxine, Preston Louise, Baxter Susan K, Booth Andrew, Turner Janette

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 1;9(8):e027743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on digital and online symptom checkers and similar services.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science and ACM Digital Library up to April 2018, supplemented by phrase searches for known symptom checkers and citation searching of key studies.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies of any design that evaluated a digital or online symptom checker or health assessment service for people seeking advice about an urgent health problem.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and quality assessment (using the Cochrane Collaboration version of QUADAS for diagnostic accuracy studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute tool for observational studies) were done by one reviewer with a sample checked for accuracy and consistency. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies structured around pre-defined research questions and key outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 29 publications (27 studies). Evidence on patient safety was weak. Diagnostic accuracy varied between different systems but was generally low. Algorithm-based triage tended to be more risk averse than that of health professionals. There was very limited evidence on patients' compliance with online triage advice. Study participants generally expressed high levels of satisfaction, although in mainly uncontrolled studies. Younger and more highly educated people were more likely to use these services.

CONCLUSIONS

The English 'digital 111' service has been implemented against a background of uncertainty around the likely impact on important outcomes. The health system may need to respond to short-term changes and/or shifts in demand. The popularity of online and digital services with younger and more educated people has implications for health equity.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018093564.

摘要

目标

在英国,国民保健服务111热线服务通过电话为紧急健康问题提供评估和分诊。该服务的数字版本最近已推出。我们旨在系统地回顾关于数字和在线症状检查器及类似服务的证据。

设计

系统评价。

数据来源

我们检索了截至2018年4月的Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、健康管理信息联盟、科学引文索引和美国计算机协会数字图书馆,并通过对已知症状检查器的短语搜索和关键研究的引文检索进行补充。

纳入标准

对任何设计的研究进行评估,这些研究针对寻求紧急健康问题建议的人群,评估数字或在线症状检查器或健康评估服务。

数据提取与综合

由一名评审员进行数据提取和质量评估(使用Cochrane协作网的QUADAS版本进行诊断准确性研究,使用美国国立心肺血液研究所的工具进行观察性研究),并对样本进行准确性和一致性检查。我们围绕预先定义的研究问题和关键结果对纳入的研究进行了叙述性综合。

结果

我们纳入了29篇出版物(27项研究)。关于患者安全的证据薄弱。不同系统的诊断准确性各不相同,但总体较低。基于算法的分诊往往比卫生专业人员更倾向于规避风险。关于患者对在线分诊建议的依从性的证据非常有限。研究参与者总体上表达了较高的满意度,尽管主要是在未设对照的研究中。年轻和受教育程度较高的人更有可能使用这些服务。

结论

英国的“数字111”服务是在对重要结果可能产生的影响存在不确定性的背景下实施的。卫生系统可能需要应对短期变化和/或需求转移。在线和数字服务在年轻和受教育程度较高人群中的普及对健康公平性有影响。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42018093564。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/527b/6688675/72dc2aa9d99f/bmjopen-2018-027743f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验