• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎体成形术与非手术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus non-operative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No. 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2369-2380. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05101-8. Epub 2019 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-019-05101-8
PMID:31375875
Abstract

PURPOSE

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in the elderly population and are often treated using percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). However, the effectiveness of PVP reported by various randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze, from published literature, the efficacy and safety of PVP for OVCFs.

METHODS

A search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Libraries since their respective inception on January 1, 2019, for RCTs of OVCFs treated with PVP compared with non-operative treatment. The primary outcomes were pain relief at 1 to 2 weeks, 1 to 3 months, and 6 to 12 months. The secondary outcome was the rate of occurrence of new vertebral fractures. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 13 RCTs comprising 1624 patients were included. For the blinded studies, statistical differences were found between PVP and the sham injection group for the 3 primary outcomes in the subgroup of the Vertebroplasty for Acute Painful Osteoporotic fractURes (VAPOUR) trial. Although pain scores were similar between the PVP group and the sham injection group for the VAPOUR trial at each period, the effect size of PVP increased over time. For the open-label studies, PVP significantly reduced pain at all time points. The risk of new vertebral fractures was similar between the PVP groups and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of PVP was effective and safe only in patients with acute OVCFs having persistent and severe pain. No benefits were recorded, among patients with older fractures or those bearing non-severe symptoms.

摘要

目的

骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)在老年人群中很常见,通常采用经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗。然而,各种随机对照试验(RCTs)报告的 PVP 的疗效并不明确。本研究旨在从已发表的文献中分析 PVP 治疗 OVCFs 的疗效和安全性。

方法

从 Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Libraries 中进行检索,检索时间均从 2019 年 1 月 1 日开始,纳入比较 PVP 与非手术治疗 OVCFs 的 RCTs。主要结局为治疗后 1 至 2 周、1 至 3 个月和 6 至 12 个月时的疼痛缓解程度。次要结局为新发椎体骨折的发生率。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 13 项 RCTs,包含 1624 名患者。对于盲法研究,在 Vertebroplasty for Acute Painful Osteoporotic fractURes(VAPOUR)试验的亚组中,PVP 与假注射组在 3 个主要结局上存在统计学差异。尽管在 VAPOUR 试验的每个时间段,PVP 组和假注射组的疼痛评分相似,但 PVP 的效应大小随时间增加而增加。对于开放标签研究,PVP 在所有时间点均显著减轻疼痛。PVP 组和对照组的新发椎体骨折风险相似。

结论

仅在患有持续性和严重疼痛的急性 OVCFs 患者中应用 PVP 是有效且安全的。对于陈旧性骨折或症状不严重的患者,未记录到获益。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus non-operative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮椎体成形术与非手术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2369-2380. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05101-8. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
2
Comparing pain reduction following vertebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较椎体成形术和保守治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疼痛缓解效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):455-64.
3
Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Nov;47:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.经皮椎体成形术和经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折:系统评价与成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(17):1-290. doi: 10.3310/hta18170.
5
Network meta-analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, nerve block, and conservative treatment for nonsurgery options of acute/subacute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in short-term and long-term effects.经皮椎体成形术、经皮后凸成形术、神经阻滞以及保守治疗作为急性/亚急性和慢性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)非手术治疗选择的短期和长期效果的网状荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11544. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011544.
6
Which is the best treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, or non-surgical treatment? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.哪种方法是治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的最佳方法:球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术、经皮椎体成形术还是非手术治疗?贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Feb;30(2):287-298. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4804-2. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
7
Vertebroplasty combined with facet joint block vs. vertebroplasty alone in relieving acute pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a randomized controlled clinical trial.椎体成形术联合关节突关节阻滞与单纯椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折急性疼痛的随机对照临床试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 23;23(1):807. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05753-4.
8
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY AND PERCUTANEOUS KYPHOPLASTY FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE WITH INTRAVERTEBRAL VACUUM CLEFT].经皮椎体成形术与经皮后凸成形术治疗伴椎体内真空裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 8;30(9):1104-1110. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160225.
9
Analysis of two minimally invasive procedures for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral cleft: a systematic review and meta-analysis.分析两种治疗伴有椎体内裂隙的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的微创方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 10;15(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01938-6.
10
Comparison of percutaneous balloon dilation kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty in treatment for thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jul;22(1 Suppl):96-102. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15370.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of new osteoporotic adjacent vertebral body fractures. A comparison between conservative treatment and vertebral body augmentation (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty): a systematic review and meta-analysis.新发骨质疏松性相邻椎体骨折的发生率。保守治疗与椎体强化术(椎体成形术、后凸成形术)的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2025 May 20;12:1594217. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1594217. eCollection 2025.
2
Timing of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的时机:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Surg. 2025 May 14;12:1539057. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1539057. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 4;4(4):CD006349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006349.pub3.
2
Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较:前瞻性随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Nov;47:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective multicenter international randomized controlled study.
Precooling storage of bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中骨水泥的预冷储存
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08162-x.
4
Risk of new vertebral compression fractures and serious adverse effects after vertebroplasty: a systematic, critical review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.椎体成形术后新发椎体压缩骨折及严重不良反应的风险:一项对随机对照试验的系统、批判性综述与荟萃分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Nov 1;14(11):7848-7861. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-396. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
5
A biomechanical investigation comparing a novel bone cement bridging screw system with conventional treatment methods for Kummell's disease.一种新型骨水泥桥接螺钉系统与传统治疗方法治疗 Kummell 病的生物力学研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77511-6.
6
Pain Intervention for Osteoporotic Compression Fracture, From Physical Therapy to Surgery: A Literature Review.骨质疏松性压缩骨折的疼痛干预:从物理治疗到手术——文献综述
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep 25;20(3):159-167. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e32. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Rheological Analysis and Evaluation of Measurement Techniques for Curing Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Bone Cement in Vertebroplasty.骨水泥在椎体成形术中聚合的流变性分析及测量技术评估。
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024 Jul 8;10(7):4575-4586. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c00417. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
8
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.棘突间装置在老年腰椎退变患者中是否安全有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
9
Robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture treatment and risk factor screening for postoperative refracture.机器人辅助经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折及术后再骨折的危险因素筛查。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 13;18(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01776-8.
10
Preoperative Prediction of New Vertebral Fractures after Vertebral Augmentation with a Radiomics Nomogram.基于影像组学列线图的椎体强化术后新发椎体骨折的术前预测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 16;13(22):3459. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223459.
椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性多中心国际随机对照研究。
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2016 Sep-Dec;13(3):234-236. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2016.13.3.234. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
4
Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.椎体成形术治疗急性疼痛性骨质疏松性骨折的安全性和有效性(VAPOUR):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1408-1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Comparing Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Conservative Therapy for Treating Osteoporotic Compression Fractures in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮椎体成形术与保守疗法治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩骨折的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jun 15;98(12):1041-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00425.
6
Management of the Elderly With Vertebral Compression Fractures.老年椎体压缩骨折的管理
Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S33-45. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000947.
7
Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions.确定针对疼痛性骨科疾病的干预措施治疗益处的临床重要性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Feb 3;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x.
8
The clinical efficacy of vertebroplasty on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a meta-analysis.椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床疗效:Meta 分析。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with conservative treatment in patients with chronic painful osteoporotic spinal fractures.经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性脊柱骨折患者的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar;21(3):473-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
10
Comparing pain reduction following vertebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较椎体成形术和保守治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疼痛缓解效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):455-64.