Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Campus Mundet, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Faculty of Psychology, Education Sciences and Sport, University Ramon Llull, Cister Street, 34, 08022, Barcelona, Spain.
Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Oct;25(5):1277-1283. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00760-2. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
Obese and overweight people deal with more daily problems and stressful situations than normal-weight individuals, for example, discrimination and bias. The aims of the present study were twofold: to identify differences between overweight and normal-weight people in coping strategies and eating behaviors, and to examine the relationship between coping strategies, eating behaviors and BMI.
Sample of the present study consisted of 473 participants, 76.7% women (mean age = 32.7; SD = 11.4). Participants completed an ad hoc sociodemographic data questionnaire, the Coping Strategies Inventory, and the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Welch's t test and X comparison analysis were used to identify differences in coping strategies and eating behaviors, according two BMI groups, normal weight and overweight. To analyze the relationship between coping strategies, eating behaviors and BMI, a structural equation modeling was conducted.
Overweight participants score significantly higher in passive coping strategies such as self-criticism, wishful thinking and social withdrawal, and unhealthy eating behaviors such as emotional eating and restrained eating. Structural equation modeling included these variables, coping strategies are more likely to conduct to unhealthy eating behaviors and these are more likely to promote and maintain a high BMI. The model showed an adequate data fit.
This research proposes a relationship between the variables analyzed. It has been proved that passive coping strategies predict a high BMI via unhealthy eating behaviors, especially emotional eating. These results are promising to improve the current prevention obesity programs and weight control treatments.
Level III, case-control analytic study.
肥胖和超重人群比正常体重人群面临更多的日常问题和压力情况,例如歧视和偏见。本研究的目的有两个:一是确定超重和正常体重人群在应对策略和饮食行为方面的差异,二是检验应对策略、饮食行为和 BMI 之间的关系。
本研究的样本由 473 名参与者组成,其中 76.7%为女性(平均年龄 32.7 岁,标准差 11.4 岁)。参与者完成了一份特定的社会人口统计学数据问卷、应对策略量表和荷兰饮食行为问卷。韦尔奇 t 检验和卡方检验用于根据 BMI 分组(正常体重和超重)确定应对策略和饮食行为的差异。为了分析应对策略、饮食行为和 BMI 之间的关系,进行了结构方程建模。
超重参与者在被动应对策略(如自我批判、一厢情愿和社交退缩)和不健康的饮食行为(如情绪化进食和节食)方面的得分显著更高。结构方程模型包括了这些变量,应对策略更有可能导致不健康的饮食行为,而这些不健康的饮食行为更有可能促进和维持高 BMI。该模型显示出较好的数据拟合度。
本研究提出了所分析变量之间的关系。研究结果表明,被动应对策略通过不健康的饮食行为预测高 BMI,尤其是情绪化进食。这些结果有望改善当前的肥胖预防计划和体重控制治疗。
三级,病例对照分析研究。