Suppr超能文献

通过人类专用的血氧饱和度仪测量的马血红蛋白氧饱和度,或通过使用温度校正和未校正氧分压的算法得出的马血红蛋白氧饱和度的回顾性比较。

Retrospective comparison of equine hemoglobin oxygen saturation measured by a human-specific co-oximeter, or derived from an algorithm using temperature-corrected and -uncorrected oxygen tension.

作者信息

Duke-Novakovski Tanya

机构信息

Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2019 Sep;46(5):636-642. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SO) is measured by co-oximetry (SO) or calculated from partial pressure of oxygen (PO) using algorithms (SO). To compare venous and systemic arterial blood sample data retrospectively and to examine whether temperature correction of PO is important.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

ANIMALS

A group of 21 healthy, adult, sedated or anesthetized horses.

METHODS

Mixed-venous and systemic arterial blood samples (1 mL) were anaerobically collected using commercial preheparinized syringes from the right ventricle and facial artery, respectively. Blood was analyzed using a commercial gas analyzer and human-specific co-oximeter within 10 minutes of collection or stored on ice and analyzed within 30 minutes. PO was measured at 37 °C and corrected using body temperature (T) from a pulmonary artery catheter thermistor. SO and hemoglobin subtypes were measured by co-oximetry (37 °C). An algorithm developed for Thoroughbred horse blood was used to calculate SO using PO at 37 °C and SO with PO corrected to T. SO and SO were each paired with SO using Bland-Altman (repeated measures) ratio of SO/SO (204 samples).

RESULTS

SO overestimated SO when PO was <80 mmHg (10.7 kPa); ratio and limits of agreement: 1.2 (0.9-1.6) but became accurate when PO was ≥80 mmHg: 1.0 (1.0-1.0). With all data, SO did not differ from SO:1.1 (0.8-1.4). Methemoglobin (FMetHb) and carboxyhemoglobin (FCOHb) were significantly higher in venous [FMetHb: median (range): 1.8 (0-2.9)%; FCOHb: 0.1 (0-2)%] than in arterial blood [FMetHb: 0.5 (0-2.2)%; FCOHb: 0 (0-0.3)%].

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm appeared robust when PO was ≥80 mmHg (10.7 kPa) but overestimated when PO was lower. Temperature correction was not important within 34.9-37.3 °C.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

SO overestimation in venous blood can result in calculation of higher intrapulmonary shunt fraction than SO values.

摘要

目的

血红蛋白氧饱和度(SO)通过共血氧定量法(SO)进行测量,或使用算法根据氧分压(PO)计算得出(SO)。回顾性比较静脉血和体动脉血样本数据,并检查PO的温度校正是否重要。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

动物

一组21匹健康、成年、镇静或麻醉的马。

方法

分别使用商用预肝素化注射器从右心室和面部动脉厌氧采集1 mL混合静脉血和体动脉血样本。采集后10分钟内使用商用气体分析仪和针对人类的共血氧定量仪对血液进行分析,或将血液储存在冰上并在30分钟内进行分析。在37°C下测量PO,并使用肺动脉导管热敏电阻测得的体温(T)进行校正。通过共血氧定量法(37°C)测量SO和血红蛋白亚型。使用为纯种马血液开发的算法,根据37°C时的PO计算SO,并根据校正至T的PO计算SO。使用Bland-Altman(重复测量)法将SO和SO分别与SO配对,计算SO/SO的比值(204个样本)。

结果

当PO<80 mmHg(10.7 kPa)时,SO高估了SO;比值和一致性界限:1.2(0.9 - 1.6),但当PO≥80 mmHg时变得准确:1.0(1.0 - 1.0)。对于所有数据,SO与SO无差异:1.1(0.8 - 1.4)。静脉血中的高铁血红蛋白(FMetHb)和碳氧血红蛋白(FCOHb)显著高于动脉血[FMetHb:中位数(范围):1.8(0 - 2.9)%;FCOHb:0.1(0 - 2)%],而动脉血中[FMetHb:0.5(0 - 2.2)%;FCOHb:0(0 - 0.3)%]。

结论

当PO≥80 mmHg(10.7 kPa)时,该算法表现稳健,但当PO较低时会高估结果。在34.9 - 37.3°C范围内,温度校正并不重要。

临床意义

静脉血中SO的高估会导致计算出的肺内分流分数高于SO值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验