Suppr超能文献

混合静脉血氧饱和度:通过共血氧测定法测量与根据混合静脉血氧分压计算得出。

Mixed venous O2 saturation: measured by co-oximetry versus calculated from PVO2.

作者信息

Nierman D M, Schechter C B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029-6574.

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1994 Jan;10(1):39-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01651465.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of our study were (1) to compare mixed venous saturations calculated by a blood gas machine with those measured directly by a co-oximeter; and (2) to compare the sensitivities and specificities of VO2s derived from these values.

METHODS

Charts were retrospectively reviewed of all MICU patients [n = 16] between December 1, 1991 and January 31, 1992, who required pulmonary artery catheters for their usual care and who had hemoglobin saturations of mixed venous blood concurrently measured by both a co-oximeter (Co-Ox Model 482, Instrumentation Lab, Lexington, MA) and a blood gas analyzer (Nova Biomedical StatLab5, Waltham, MA) which uses a variant of the Severinghaus equation to calculate SVO2 from PVO2). Data used at the time of each SVO2 measurement to calculate oxygen consumption (VO2) further was collected.

RESULTS

Available for analysis were 118 mixed venous blood samples. Although the SVO2 values had a correlation coefficient of 0.807 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.736 to 0.861, Fisher's z-transform), when VO2s were calculated, the blood gas analyzer calculated saturations had a sensitivity of only 58.3% and a specificity of 89%, when compared with those calculated using the saturations measured by the co-oximeter. Attempts to mathematically improve upon the Severinghaus equation and upon an additional four regression equations used by other blood gas analyzers resulted in universally worse sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

If SVO2s calculated by a blood gas machine--rather than those co-oximetrically measured--are used to calculate VO2s, 42% of patients with low O2s will be misclassified as normal and 11% of normals will be misclassified as low. This total error appears to be the result of measurement error by the PO2 electrode of the blood gas analyzer and shifts of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve, which are not accounted for in the equation that is used to calculate saturation from measured PO2. We were not able to improve mathematically the sensitivity of any of the available regression equations used by blood gas analyzers to calculate SVO2 from PVO2. Therefore, it remains necessary to use co-oximetrically measured saturations when calculating VO2.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是:(1)比较血气分析仪计算所得的混合静脉血氧饱和度与经比色计直接测量的结果;(2)比较由这些值得出的氧耗量(VO2)的敏感性和特异性。

方法

回顾性查阅了1991年12月1日至1992年1月31日期间所有入住重症监护病房(MICU)的患者[共16例]的病历,这些患者在常规治疗中需要使用肺动脉导管,且其混合静脉血的血红蛋白饱和度同时由比色计(型号为482的Co-Ox,仪器实验室,马萨诸塞州列克星敦)和血气分析仪(诺瓦生物医学StatLab5,马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆)进行测量,该血气分析仪使用Severinghaus方程的一个变体从混合静脉血氧分压(PVO2)计算混合静脉血氧饱和度(SVO2)。还收集了每次测量SVO2时用于计算氧耗量(VO2)的数据。

结果

共有118份混合静脉血样本可供分析。虽然SVO2值的相关系数为0.807(95%置信区间[CI]为0.736至0.861,费舍尔z变换),但在计算VO2时,与使用比色计测量的饱和度计算所得的结果相比,血气分析仪计算的饱和度的敏感性仅为58.3%,特异性为89%。试图在数学上改进Severinghaus方程以及其他血气分析仪使用的另外四个回归方程,结果普遍导致敏感性更差。

结论

如果使用血气分析仪计算的SVO2而非经比色计测量的结果来计算VO2,42%的低氧患者将被误分类为正常,11%的正常患者将被误分类为低氧。这种总误差似乎是由于血气分析仪的PO2电极测量误差以及氧合血红蛋白解离曲线的偏移导致的,而在用于从测量的PO2计算饱和度的方程中并未考虑这些因素。我们无法在数学上提高血气分析仪用于从PVO2计算SVO2的任何现有回归方程的值。因此,在计算VO2时仍有必要使用经比色计测量的饱和度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验