Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e026039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026039.
To identify and explore change processes explaining the effects of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) intervention taking account of reach, amount of intervention received, delivery fidelity and patient and caregiver perspectives.
Mixed methods process evaluation parallel to a randomised controlled trial using data from the intervention group (REACH-HF plus usual care).
Four centres in the UK (Birmingham, Cornwall, Gwent and York).
People with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their caregivers.
The REACH-HF intervention consisted of a self-help manual for patients with HFrEF and caregivers facilitated over 12 weeks by trained healthcare professionals. The process evaluation used multimodal mixed methods analysis. Data consisted of audio recorded intervention sessions; demographic data; intervention fidelity scores for intervention group participants (107 patients and 53 caregivers); qualitative interviews at 4 and 12 months with a sample of 19 patients and 17 caregivers.
Quantitative data: intervention fidelity and number, frequency and duration of intervention sessions received. Qualitative data: experiences and perspectives of intervention participants and caregivers.
Intervention session attendance with facilitators was high. Fidelity scores were indicative of adequate quality of REACH-HF intervention delivery, although indicating scope for improvement in several areas. Intervention effectiveness was contingent on matching the intervention implementation to the concerns, beliefs and goals of participants. Behaviour change was sustained when shared meaning was established. Respondents' comorbidities, socio-economic circumstances and existing networks of support also affected changes in health-related quality of life.
By combining longitudinal mixed methods data, the essential ingredients of complex interventions can be better identified, interrogated and tested. This can maximise the clinical application of research findings and enhance the capacity of multidisciplinary and multisite teams to implement the intervention.
ISRCTN25032672; Pre-results.
从可及性、干预接受程度、实施保真度以及患者和照护者的角度出发,识别和探讨能够解释康复赋能慢性心力衰竭(REACH-HF)干预效果的变化过程。
对接受 REACH-HF 干预(REACH-HF 加常规护理)的干预组进行随机对照试验的同时进行混合方法过程评估。
英国四个中心(伯明翰、康沃尔、格温特和约克)。
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者及其照护者。
REACH-HF 干预措施包括为 HFrEF 患者及其照护者提供的自助手册,并由经过培训的医疗保健专业人员在 12 周内进行促进。该过程评估使用多模式混合方法分析。数据包括音频记录的干预会话;人口统计学数据;干预组参与者(107 名患者和 53 名照护者)的干预保真度评分;对 19 名患者和 17 名照护者的 4 个月和 12 个月进行的定性访谈。
与促进者一起参加干预课程的出勤率很高。保真度评分表明 REACH-HF 干预实施质量较高,但在几个方面仍有改进的空间。干预效果取决于将干预实施与参与者的关注点、信念和目标相匹配。当建立共同的意义时,行为改变就会持续。受访者的合并症、社会经济状况和现有的支持网络也会影响健康相关生活质量的变化。
通过结合纵向混合方法数据,可以更好地识别、审查和测试复杂干预措施的基本要素。这可以最大程度地将研究结果应用于临床,并增强多学科和多站点团队实施干预的能力。
ISRCTN25032672;预结果。