Bosman Angelina L, Loest Daleen, Carson Carolee A, Agunos Agnes, Collineau Lucie, Léger David F
Centre for Food-borne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jul 17;6:220. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00220. eCollection 2019.
Antimicrobial use surveillance data need to be analyzed and reported in a standardized and harmonized way. In veterinary medicine, one approach is to use defined daily doses (DDD) for animals. DDD for animals are technical standards used in various measures or metrics that quantify antimicrobial use. The European Medicines Agency published principles for assigning DDDvet values based on information on dosing obtained from nine European countries. For measuring antimicrobial use in livestock within Canada, DDDs for animals reflective of Canadian veterinary antimicrobial use (DDDvetCAs) were needed. Our objectives were (1) to describe the development of DDDvetCA standards for pigs and poultry (broiler chickens and turkeys) for authorized and compounded antimicrobial active ingredients used in Canada, including those used extra-label; and (2) to compare the DDDvetCAs with EMA's DDDvets, where possible. Species-specific DDDvetCAs were assigned based on the average of unique antimicrobial daily doses obtained from product information, stratified by route of administration and age indication (where applicable). The feed, water and bolus DDDvetCAs were compared to oral DDDvets, and injectable DDDvetCAs to parenteral DDDvets, that matched by antimicrobial active ingredient. Seventy-five DDDvetCAs were assigned for pigs; 51 for poultry. Seventeen injectable DDDvetCAs could be compared to 14 EMA's parenteral DDDvets and 53 feed, water, and bolus DDDvetCAs could be compared to 40 oral DDDvets. Feed and water DDDvetCAs were generally lower than EMA's oral DDDvets, although differences in methodology between Canada and Europe make comparisons challenging. The assignment of DDDvetCAs was a resource intensive and iterative process. EMA's published principles for assigning DDDvets were an invaluable source of information. The use of DDDvetCAs will reflect exposure of Canadian animals to antimicrobials, be useful for evaluating associations between use and resistance within Canada and provide information for risk assessment and stewardship policies. However, when reporting antimicrobial use data internationally, using the same DDD standards as other reporting countries will facilitate between country comparisons, although differences in which antimicrobial active ingredients are licensed between countries may create challenges. Future steps include assigning DDDvetCAs for other food animal species, such as cattle, veal, and farmed fish.
抗菌药物使用监测数据需要以标准化和统一的方式进行分析和报告。在兽医学中,一种方法是对动物使用限定日剂量(DDD)。动物的DDD是用于各种量化抗菌药物使用的措施或指标的技术标准。欧洲药品管理局根据从九个欧洲国家获得的给药信息,发布了确定DDDvet值的原则。为了衡量加拿大境内家畜的抗菌药物使用情况,需要反映加拿大兽医抗菌药物使用情况的动物DDD(DDDvetCAs)。我们的目标是:(1)描述加拿大用于猪和家禽(肉鸡和火鸡)的授权和复方抗菌活性成分的DDDvetCA标准的制定情况,包括那些超说明书使用的成分;(2)在可能的情况下,将DDDvetCAs与欧洲药品管理局的DDDvets进行比较。特定物种的DDDvetCAs是根据从产品信息中获得的独特抗菌日剂量的平均值确定的,并按给药途径和年龄指征(如适用)进行分层。将饲料、饮水和大丸剂的DDDvetCAs与口服DDDvets进行比较,将注射用DDDvetCAs与肠胃外DDDvets进行比较,这些比较是按抗菌活性成分进行匹配的。为猪确定了75个DDDvetCAs;为家禽确定了51个。17个注射用DDDvetCAs可以与14个欧洲药品管理局的肠胃外DDDvets进行比较,53个饲料、饮水和大丸剂的DDDvetCAs可以与40个口服DDDvets进行比较。饲料和饮水的DDDvetCAs通常低于欧洲药品管理局的口服DDDvets,不过加拿大和欧洲之间方法上的差异使得比较具有挑战性。确定DDDvetCAs是一个资源密集且反复的过程。欧洲药品管理局发布的确定DDDvets的原则是非常宝贵的信息来源。使用DDDvetCAs将反映加拿大动物对抗菌药物的暴露情况,有助于评估加拿大境内使用与耐药性之间的关联,并为风险评估和管理政策提供信息。然而,在国际上报告抗菌药物使用数据时,采用与其他报告国家相同的DDD标准将便于进行国家间比较,尽管各国获批的抗菌活性成分存在差异可能会带来挑战。未来的步骤包括为其他食用动物物种,如牛、犊牛和养殖鱼类确定DDDvetCAs。