Bosman Angelina L, Deckert Anne E, Carson Carolee A, Poljak Zvonimir, Reid-Smith Richard J, McEwen Scott A
Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Foodborne Disease and Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Division, Centre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, 370 Speedvale Avenue West, Suite #201, Guelph, ON, N1H 7M7, Canada.
Porcine Health Manag. 2022 Apr 28;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40813-022-00259-w.
Data on antimicrobial use (AMU) in pig production are needed for the development of good antimicrobial stewardship practices to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria that can cause illness in animals and humans. In Canada, there is a lack of quantitative data on AMU in the farrowing and nursery stages of pig production. This study aimed to determine which antimicrobial active ingredients are currently used in farrowing, nursery, and grower-finisher herds in the province of Ontario, Canada, and to quantify AMU using various metrics. We collected data on herd demographics, biosecurity, health status, and AMU during one production cycle from 25 farrowing and 25 nursery herds in Ontario, between May 2017 and April 2018, and obtained data from 23 Ontario grower-finisher herds during the same time frame from the Public Health Agency's Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance. We applied frequency measures, and weight-, and dose-based metrics to the data.
In all pigs, the highest quantity of AMU was administered in-feed. By all routes of administration and compared to other production stages, nursery pigs used more antimicrobials in mg/kg biomass and the number of Canadian defined daily doses per 1000 pig-days (dose rate), while grower-finisher pigs used more antimicrobials in total kilograms and the number of Canadian defined daily doses per pig. In suckling pigs in some herds, there was routine disease prevention use of ceftiofur, an antimicrobial active ingredient categorized as very highly important in human medicine by Health Canada. The top antimicrobial used in each stage of pig production often varied by the metric used. There was producer-reported growth promotion use of antimicrobials in suckling and grower-finisher feed.
The results of this study provide a current picture of AMU in pigs in Ontario and can be used as a basis for further research on AMU in farrowing and nursery herds in Canada. Our findings confirm that it would be useful to include farrowing and nursery herds in routine AMU surveillance in Canada. A future analysis using data from this project will examine factors that affect the quantity of AMU.
为制定良好的抗菌药物管理措施以降低可导致动物和人类患病的细菌产生耐药性的风险,需要有关生猪生产中抗菌药物使用(AMU)的数据。在加拿大,生猪生产的产仔和保育阶段缺乏AMU的定量数据。本研究旨在确定加拿大安大略省目前在产仔、保育和育肥猪群中使用哪些抗菌活性成分,并使用各种指标对AMU进行量化。我们在2017年5月至2018年4月期间,从安大略省的25个产仔猪群和25个保育猪群中收集了一个生产周期内的猪群人口统计学、生物安全、健康状况和AMU数据,并从公共卫生机构的加拿大抗菌药物耐药性综合监测计划中获取了同一时间段内23个安大略省育肥猪群的数据。我们对数据应用了频率测量、基于体重和剂量的指标。
在所有猪中,AMU的最大用量是通过饲料给药。按所有给药途径以及与其他生产阶段相比,保育猪每千克生物量使用的抗菌药物更多,每1000猪日的加拿大规定日剂量数(剂量率)也更多,而育肥猪使用的抗菌药物总量和每头猪的加拿大规定日剂量数更多。在一些猪群的哺乳仔猪中,存在常规预防性使用头孢噻呋的情况,头孢噻呋是一种被加拿大卫生部归类为对人类医学非常重要的抗菌活性成分。生猪生产各阶段使用的最主要抗菌药物往往因所使用的指标而异。有生产者报告在哺乳仔猪和育肥猪饲料中使用抗菌药物促进生长。
本研究结果提供了安大略省生猪AMU的现状,可作为加拿大产仔和保育猪群AMU进一步研究的基础。我们的研究结果证实,将产仔和保育猪群纳入加拿大常规AMU监测是有用的。使用本项目数据的未来分析将研究影响AMU数量的因素。