Department of Psychology.
Cognitive Psychology Unit and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Sep;45(9):1265-1270. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000673. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
How do we manage to shield our goals against distraction? Traditionally, this ability has been attributed to top-down cognitive control, which is assumed to monitor for and intervene in case of response conflicts. However, this account has been challenged by episodic-retrieval views, which attribute sequential modulations of conflict effects to bottom-up memory for stimulus and response features. Here we tested a new theory suggesting that that control and retrieval accounts are no alternatives but, rather, 2 sides of the same coin. According to this view, the control parameter can become stored in event files, together with stimulus, response, and context codes, so that cognitive control operations, independently from the stimulus-response codes the operate on, can come under mnemonic control. Using a novel design that eliminates any stimulus and response binding and at the same time disentangles conflict and retrieval of control states, we provide the strongest evidence to date that abstract control parameters are stored into trial-specific event files. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
我们如何设法保护我们的目标免受干扰?传统上,这种能力归因于自上而下的认知控制,它被假设为监测和干预反应冲突的情况。然而,这种解释受到了情景检索观点的挑战,情景检索观点将冲突效应的顺序调制归因于对刺激和反应特征的自下而上的记忆。在这里,我们测试了一个新的理论,该理论表明控制和检索解释不是替代关系,而是同一枚硬币的两面。根据这种观点,控制参数可以与刺激、反应和上下文代码一起存储在事件文件中,因此,认知控制操作可以在不依赖于操作的刺激-反应代码的情况下受到记忆控制。使用一种新颖的设计,该设计消除了任何刺激和反应的结合,同时分离了冲突和控制状态的检索,我们提供了迄今为止最有力的证据,证明抽象控制参数被存储在特定于试验的事件文件中。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。