• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

游击队员使用可分离的神经系统处理基于政策和基于身份的信息。

Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Moore Hall, 3 Maynard St, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

Department of Psychology, Columbia University, 1190 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae368.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhae368
PMID:39270673
Abstract

Political partisanship is often conceived as a lens through which people view politics. Behavioral research has distinguished two types of "partisan lenses"-policy-based and identity-based-that may influence peoples' perception of political events. Little is known, however, about the mechanisms through which partisan discourse appealing to policy beliefs or targeting partisan identities operate within individuals. We addressed this question by collecting neuroimaging data while participants watched videos of speakers expressing partisan views. A "partisan lens effect" was identified as the difference in neural synchrony between each participant's brain response and that of their partisan ingroup vs. outgroup. When processing policy-based messaging, a partisan lens effect was observed in socio-political reasoning and affective responding brain regions. When processing negative identity-based attacks, a partisan lens effect was observed in mentalizing and affective responding brain regions. These data suggest that the processing of political discourse that appeals to different forms of partisanship is supported by related but distinguishable neural-and therefore psychological-mechanisms, which may have implications for how we characterize partisanship and ameliorate its deleterious impacts.

摘要

政治党派偏见通常被视为人们看待政治的一种视角。行为研究已经区分了两种“党派偏见视角”——基于政策的和基于身份认同的,它们可能会影响人们对政治事件的看法。然而,对于在个体内部,党派言论诉诸政策信仰或针对党派身份的运作机制,我们知之甚少。我们通过收集参与者观看演讲者表达党派观点的视频时的神经影像学数据来解决这个问题。“党派偏见视角效应”被定义为每个参与者的大脑反应与他们的党派内群体和外群体的大脑反应之间的差异。当处理基于政策的信息时,会在社会政治推理和情感反应的大脑区域观察到党派偏见视角效应。当处理负面的基于身份认同的攻击时,会在心理理论和情感反应的大脑区域观察到党派偏见视角效应。这些数据表明,吸引不同形式党派偏见的政治话语的处理是由相关但可区分的神经和心理机制支持的,这可能对我们如何描述党派偏见以及减轻其有害影响具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems.游击队员使用可分离的神经系统处理基于政策和基于身份的信息。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae368.
2
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.《党派大脑:基于身份认同的政治信仰模式》
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
3
Partisan language in a polarized world: In-group language provides reputational benefits to speakers while polarizing audiences.在极化的世界中使用党派语言:群体内语言为说话者提供声誉利益,同时使听众两极分化。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:106012. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106012. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
Partisan Bias in Political Judgment.政治判断中的党派偏见。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):717-740. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-030424-122723. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
5
Intolerance of uncertainty modulates brain-to-brain synchrony during politically polarized perception.不确定性容忍度调节政治极化感知过程中的大脑间同步性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 18;118(20). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022491118.
6
The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility?党派思维:极端政治党派偏见与认知灵活性有关吗?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):407-418. doi: 10.1037/xge0000661. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Deeper Than You Think: Partisanship-Dependent Brain Responses in Early Sensory and Motor Brain Regions.远比你想象的更深入: partisanship-dependent brain responses in early sensory and motor brain regions.
J Neurosci. 2023 Feb 8;43(6):1027-1037. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0895-22.2022. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
8
Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.理解生物医学研究辩论中的公众舆论:超越政治党派之争,关注对科学与社会的信念。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088473. eCollection 2014.
9
Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability.感知者和目标党派转移对面部可信度的影响,从而影响喜好度。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 15;13(1):6130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33307-8.
10
Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship.负面党派偏见并不比正面党派偏见更普遍。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jul;6(7):951-963. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0. Epub 2022 May 19.