Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Medical marijuana use may substitute prescription opioid use, whereas nonmedical marijuana use may be a risk factor of prescription opioid misuse. This study examined the associations between recreational marijuana legalization and prescription opioids received by Medicaid enrollees.
State-level quarterly prescription drug utilization records for Medicaid enrollees during 2010-2017 were obtained from Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data. The primary outcome, opioid prescriptions received, was measured in three population-adjusted variables: number of opioid prescriptions, total doses of opioid prescriptions in morphine milligram equivalents, and related Medicaid spending, per quarter per 100 enrollees. Two difference-in-difference models were used to test the associations: eight states and DC that legalized recreational marijuana during the study period were first compared among themselves, then compared to six states with medical marijuana legalized before the study period. Schedule II and III opioids were analyzed separately.
In models comparing eight states and DC, legalization was not associated with Schedule II opioid outcomes; having recreational marijuana legalization effective in 2015 was associated with reductions in number of prescriptions, total doses, and spending of Schedule III opioids by 32% (95% CI: (-49%, -15%), p = 0.003), 30% ((-55%, -4.4%), p = 0.027), and 31% ((-59%, -3.6%), p = 0.031), respectively. In models comparing eight states and DC to six states with medical marijuana legalization, recreational marijuana legalization was not associated with any opioid outcome.
No evidence suggested that recreational marijuana legalization increased prescription opioids received by Medicaid enrollees. There was some evidence in some states for reduced Schedule III opioids following the legalization.
医用大麻的使用可能会替代处方类阿片的使用,而非医用大麻的使用可能是处方类阿片滥用的一个风险因素。本研究调查了娱乐性大麻合法化与医疗补助计划参保者接受的处方类阿片之间的关联。
从医疗补助计划州药物利用数据中获取了 2010-2017 年期间医疗补助计划参保者的州级季度处方药物利用记录。主要结果,即接受的阿片类药物处方,以三个人口调整变量进行衡量:每季度每 100 名参保者接受的阿片类药物处方数量、以吗啡毫克当量计算的阿片类药物处方总剂量、相关医疗补助计划支出。使用两个差分模型来检验关联:在研究期间将娱乐性大麻合法化的八个州和哥伦比亚特区首先相互比较,然后与在研究前就已将医用大麻合法化的六个州进行比较。分别分析表 II 和表 III 类阿片药物。
在比较八个州和哥伦比亚特区的模型中,大麻合法化与表 II 类阿片类药物结果无关;在 2015 年有效的娱乐性大麻合法化与表 III 类阿片类药物的处方数量、总剂量和支出分别减少 32%(95%CI:(-49%, -15%),p=0.003)、30%((-55%, -4.4%),p=0.027)和 31%((-59%, -3.6%),p=0.031)有关。在将八个州和哥伦比亚特区与六个已将医用大麻合法化的州进行比较的模型中,娱乐性大麻合法化与任何阿片类药物结果无关。
没有证据表明娱乐性大麻合法化增加了医疗补助计划参保者接受的处方类阿片药物。在一些州,有一些证据表明在合法化之后,表 III 类阿片类药物有所减少。