• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality improvement of neuro-oncology services: integrating the routine collection of patient-reported, health-related quality-of-life measures.神经肿瘤学服务的质量改进:整合患者报告的、与健康相关的生活质量指标的常规收集。
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 May;6(3):226-236. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy040. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany.整合跨领域的心理肿瘤学(isPO):德国为新诊断癌症患者提供的一种新的护理形式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07782-0.
5
An implementation study of electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes in inpatient radiation oncology.住院放射肿瘤学中患者报告结局电子评估的实施研究
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jul 19;6(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00478-3.
6
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
7
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
8
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Surgery for Glioblastomas.胶质母细胞瘤的精准手术
J Pers Med. 2025 Feb 28;15(3):96. doi: 10.3390/jpm15030096.
2
Implementation of electronic prospective surveillance models in cancer care: a scoping review.电子前瞻性监测模型在癌症护理中的实施:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Apr 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01265-4.
3
Is the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale appropriate as an initial screening measure to identify brain tumour patients who may possibly have a mood disorder?EORTC QLQ-C30 情感功能量表是否适合作为初步筛查工具,以确定可能患有情绪障碍的脑肿瘤患者?
Psychooncology. 2022 Jun;31(6):995-1002. doi: 10.1002/pon.5889. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
4
Classification of Adverse Events Following Surgery in Patients With Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas.弥漫性低级别胶质瘤患者术后不良事件的分类
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 21;11:792878. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.792878. eCollection 2021.
5
Improvement of the Efficiency and Completeness of Neuro-Oncology Patient Referrals to a Tertiary Center Through the Implementation of an Electronic Referral System: Retrospective Cohort Study.通过实施电子转诊系统提高神经肿瘤患者转诊至三级中心的效率和完整性:回顾性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 5;22(3):e15002. doi: 10.2196/15002.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive function, depression, fatigue and quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer.头颈癌长期幸存者的认知功能、抑郁、疲劳及生活质量
Neurooncol Pract. 2015 Sep;2(3):144-150. doi: 10.1093/nop/npv012. Epub 2015 May 7.
2
Health-related quality of life and psychological functioning in patients with primary malignant brain tumors: a systematic review of clinical, demographic and mental health factors.原发性恶性脑肿瘤患者的健康相关生活质量和心理功能:对临床、人口统计学和心理健康因素的系统评价
Neurooncol Pract. 2016 Dec;3(4):211-221. doi: 10.1093/nop/npv042. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach.探索:长期护理中质量改进活动的可持续性与推广——一种混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 12;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2978-0.
4
Making Patients and Doctors Happier - The Potential of Patient-Reported Outcomes.让患者和医生更满意——患者报告结局的潜力
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1309-1312. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1707537.
5
Impact of neurocognitive deficits on patient-proxy agreement regarding health-related quality of life in low-grade glioma patients.神经认知缺陷对低级别胶质瘤患者健康相关生活质量的患者代理一致性的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Apr;26(4):869-880. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1426-z. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Evaluating patients for psychosocial distress and supportive care needs based on health-related quality of life in primary brain tumors: a prospective multicenter analysis of patients with gliomas in an outpatient setting.基于原发性脑肿瘤患者健康相关生活质量评估其心理社会困扰和支持性护理需求:门诊环境下胶质瘤患者的前瞻性多中心分析。
J Neurooncol. 2017 Jan;131(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2280-0. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Reporting of patient-reported health-related quality of life in adults with diffuse low-grade glioma: a systematic review.弥漫性低级别胶质瘤成年患者自我报告的健康相关生活质量报告:一项系统综述
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Nov;18(11):1475-1486. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now107. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
Current and future strategies for treatment of glioma.胶质瘤治疗的当前及未来策略
Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Jan;40(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0709-8. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
Attitudes and preferences toward monitoring symptoms, distress, and quality of life in glioma patients and their informal caregivers.胶质瘤患者及其非正式照护者对症状、痛苦和生活质量监测的态度与偏好。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jul;24(7):3011-22. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3112-7. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
10
What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials.常规使用患者报告结局测量对改善癌症护理患者结局、护理过程和卫生服务结局的价值是什么?一项对照试验的系统评价。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1480-501. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948. Epub 2014 Apr 7.

神经肿瘤学服务的质量改进:整合患者报告的、与健康相关的生活质量指标的常规收集。

Quality improvement of neuro-oncology services: integrating the routine collection of patient-reported, health-related quality-of-life measures.

作者信息

Fernández-Méndez Rocío, Rastall Rebecca J, Sage William A, Oberg Ingela, Bullen Gemma, Charge Amy Louise, Crofton Anna, Santarius Thomas, Watts Colin, Price Stephen J, Brodbelt Andrew, Joannides Alexis J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK.

Neurosurgery Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Neurooncol Pract. 2019 May;6(3):226-236. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy040. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1093/nop/npy040
PMID:31385996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6656295/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Brain cancer has a strong impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and its evaluation in clinical practice can improve the quality of care provided. The aim of this project was to integrate routine collection of HRQoL information from patients with brain tumor or metastasis in 2 specialized United Kingdom tertiary centers, and to evaluate the implementation process.

METHODS

Since October 2016, routine collection of electronic self-reported HRQoL information has been progressively embedded in the participating centers using standard questionnaires. During the first year, the project was implemented, and the process evaluated, through regular cycles of process evaluation followed by an action plan, monitoring of questionnaire completion rates, and assessment of patient views.

RESULTS

Main challenges encountered included reluctance to change usual practice and limited resources. Key measures for success included strong leadership of senior staff, involvement of stakeholders in project design and evaluation, and continuous strategic support to professionals. Final project workflow included 6 process steps, 1 decision step, and 4 outputs. Questionnaires were mostly self-completed (75.1%), and completion took 6-9 minutes. Most patients agreed that the questionnaire items were easy to understand (97.0%), important for them (93.0%), and helped them think what they wanted to discuss in their clinical consultation (75.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating HRQoL information as a routine part of clinical assessments has the potential to enhance individually tailored patient care in our institutions. Challenges involved in innovations of this nature can be overcome through a systematic approach involving strong leadership, wide stakeholder engagement, and strategic planning.

摘要

背景

脑癌对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)有重大影响,在临床实践中对其进行评估可提高所提供的护理质量。本项目的目的是在英国2个专业三级中心整合对脑肿瘤或转移瘤患者HRQoL信息的常规收集,并评估实施过程。

方法

自2016年10月起,使用标准问卷将电子自我报告的HRQoL信息的常规收集逐步纳入参与中心。在项目实施的第一年,通过定期的过程评估循环,随后制定行动计划、监测问卷完成率以及评估患者意见,对该过程进行了评估。

结果

遇到的主要挑战包括不愿改变常规做法和资源有限。成功的关键措施包括高级工作人员的有力领导、利益相关者参与项目设计和评估以及对专业人员的持续战略支持。最终的项目工作流程包括6个过程步骤、1个决策步骤和4个产出。问卷大多是自我完成的(75.1%),完成时间为6 - 9分钟。大多数患者同意问卷项目易于理解(97.0%)、对他们很重要(93.0%),并且有助于他们思考在临床会诊中想要讨论的内容(75.4%)。

结论

将HRQoL信息整合为临床评估的常规部分,有可能在我们的机构中加强针对个体的患者护理。通过一种涉及有力领导、广泛的利益相关者参与和战略规划的系统方法,可以克服这类创新所涉及的挑战。