Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom.
School of Biological Sciences and The UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, (M092), Crawley, Australia.
PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 6;17(8):e3000366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000366. eCollection 2019 Aug.
Since the 1950s, industrial fisheries have expanded globally, as fishing vessels are required to travel further afield for fishing opportunities. Technological advancements and fishery subsidies have granted ever-increasing access to populations of sharks, tunas, billfishes, and other predators. Wilderness refuges, defined here as areas beyond the detectable range of human influence, are therefore increasingly rare. In order to achieve marine resources sustainability, large no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) with pelagic components are being implemented. However, such conservation efforts require knowledge of the critical habitats for predators, both across shallow reefs and the deeper ocean. Here, we fill this gap in knowledge across the Indo-Pacific by using 1,041 midwater baited videos to survey sharks and other pelagic predators such as rainbow runner (Elagatis bipinnulata), mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus), and black marlin (Istiompax indica). We modeled three key predator community attributes: vertebrate species richness, mean maximum body size, and shark abundance as a function of geomorphology, environmental conditions, and human pressures. All attributes were primarily driven by geomorphology (35%-62% variance explained) and environmental conditions (14%-49%). While human pressures had no influence on species richness, both body size and shark abundance responded strongly to distance to human markets (12%-20%). Refuges were identified at more than 1,250 km from human markets for body size and for shark abundance. These refuges were identified as remote and shallow seabed features, such as seamounts, submerged banks, and reefs. Worryingly, hotpots of large individuals and of shark abundance are presently under-represented within no-take MPAs that aim to effectively protect marine predators, such as the British Indian Ocean Territory. Population recovery of predators is unlikely to occur without strategic placement and effective enforcement of large no-take MPAs in both coastal and remote locations.
自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,随着渔船需要到更远的海域寻找捕鱼机会,全球工业渔业不断扩张。技术进步和渔业补贴使人们能够越来越多地进入鲨鱼、金枪鱼、旗鱼和其他捕食者的种群。因此,荒野保护区(这里定义为人类影响可探测范围之外的区域)越来越罕见。为了实现海洋资源的可持续性,正在实施具有公海部分的大型无捕捞海洋保护区(MPA)。然而,这种保护工作需要了解捕食者的关键栖息地,包括浅礁和深海。在这里,我们通过使用 1041 个中层诱饵视频来调查鲨鱼和其他洄游性捕食者,如彩虹鲷(Elagatis bipinnulata)、鲷鱼(Coryphaena hippurus)和黑枪鱼(Istiompax indica),填补了印度洋-太平洋地区的这一知识空白。我们构建了三个关键的捕食者群落属性模型:脊椎动物物种丰富度、平均最大体型和鲨鱼丰度,作为地貌、环境条件和人类压力的函数。所有属性主要受地貌(解释方差的 35%-62%)和环境条件(解释方差的 14%-49%)的驱动。虽然人类压力对物种丰富度没有影响,但体型和鲨鱼丰度都对距离人类市场的距离有强烈的响应(12%-20%)。对于体型和鲨鱼丰度,距离人类市场 1250 公里以上的地方被确定为保护区。这些保护区被确定为偏远和浅海底地貌,如海山、淹没的浅滩和珊瑚礁。令人担忧的是,在旨在有效保护海洋捕食者的无捕捞 MPA 中,大型个体和鲨鱼丰度的热点目前代表性不足,例如英属印度洋领地。如果不在沿海和偏远地区战略性地设置和有效执行大型无捕捞 MPA,捕食者的种群恢复是不可能的。