Suppr超能文献

鼻塞式高流量湿化氧疗不能改善 COPD 急性加重期患者的运动耐量:一项随机交叉研究。

Nasal high flow does not improve exercise tolerance in COPD patients recovering from acute exacerbation: A randomized crossover study.

机构信息

Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Pôle de Pneumologie, ORL and Dermatologie, Groupe de Recherche en Kinésithérapie Respiratoire, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), Normandie University, UNIROUEN, Rouen, France.

出版信息

Respirology. 2019 Nov;24(11):1088-1094. doi: 10.1111/resp.13664. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that by reducing respiratory work and improving gas exchange, nasal high flow (NHF) would improve exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) following respiratory exacerbation.

METHODS

This was a monocentric, randomized, controlled crossover study. Patients with severe to very severe COPD carried out two high-intensity constant work-rate exercise tests (CWRET) with and without NHF on two consecutive days. The primary outcome was the mean difference in endurance time between both conditions. The secondary aims included vastus lateralis oxygenation (StO ), dyspnoea, leg discomfort, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), transcutaneous CO pressure (PtcCO ), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR) and pulsed O saturation (SpO ), as well as the patients' opinions of the device.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were included (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s = 28.7 ± 10.8%, age = 62.1 ± 9.1 years). No significant differences in endurance time during the CWRET were found between the two test conditions (-66.58 (95% CI: -155.9 to 22.7) s, P = 0.12). StO , PtCO and HR were reduced at the end of the exercise with NHF (-2.1% (95% CI: -4.3 to -0.0); -1.3 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.5 to -0.2); -2.7 bpm (95% CI: -5.0 to -0.5), respectively, P ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were found for any of the other secondary outcomes. Half of the patients evaluated the device as being moderately to very uncomfortable.

CONCLUSION

NHF during exercise did not increase endurance time in patients with COPD following exacerbation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03058081 at clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

背景与目的

我们假设,通过降低呼吸功并改善气体交换,鼻塞高流量(NHF)可改善呼吸衰竭后慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的运动耐量。

方法

这是一项单中心、随机、对照交叉研究。患有严重至非常严重 COPD 的患者在连续两天内进行两次带有和不带有 NHF 的高强度恒功速率运动试验(CWRET)。主要结局是两种情况下耐力时间的平均差异。次要目标包括股外侧氧合(StO )、呼吸困难、腿部不适、最大吸气压力(MIP)、经皮 CO 压(PtcCO )、呼吸频率(RR)、心率(HR)和脉冲 O 饱和度(SpO ),以及患者对设备的看法。

结果

共纳入 19 例患者(平均 1 秒用力呼气量 = 28.7 ± 10.8%,年龄 = 62.1 ± 9.1 岁)。在两种测试条件下,CWRET 期间的耐力时间无显著差异(-66.58(95%CI:-155.9 至 22.7)s,P = 0.12)。运动结束时,StO 、PtCO 和 HR 随 NHF 降低(-2.1%(95%CI:-4.3 至 -0.0);-1.3mmHg(95%CI:-2.5 至 -0.2);-2.7bpm(95%CI:-5.0 至 -0.5),P ≤ 0.05)。其他次要结局均无显著差异。一半的患者评估设备舒适度为中度至非常不适。

结论

在 COPD 加重后,运动时使用 NHF 并未增加患者的耐力时间。

临床试验注册

NCT03058081 在 clinicaltrials.gov。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验