• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯洛文尼亚存在问题的行业资助的新生儿期后儿科研究。

Questionable Industry-Sponsored Postneonatal Pediatric Studies in Slovenia.

作者信息

Rose Klaus, Neubauer David, Grant-Kels Jane M

机构信息

Pediatric Drug Development & More, klausrose Consulting, Riehen, Switzerland.

Department of Child, Adolescent & Developmental Neurology, University Childrens' Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019 Jan 18;90:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.01.002
PMID:31388360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6677645/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

US and EU pediatric laws promote industry-sponsored pediatric studies, based on the therapeutic orphans concept that claims discrimination of children in drug treatment and drug development.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the medical validity of international pediatric studies with centers in Slovenia, an EU member state, and challenge their medical utility.

METHODS

We analyzed international industry-sponsored pediatric studies with centers in Slovenia, listed in www.ClinicalTrials.gov, for their medical value.

RESULTS

Most pediatric studies triggered by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the European Medicines Agency were/are without medical or scientific value. They were/are formally and regulatorily justified, but lack medical sense and thus were/are unethical. Several even harm children and/or adolescents with serious diseases by exposing them to placebo or substandard treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric studies triggered by US and EU regulatory demands are a serious abuse of nonneonatal children and adolescents in Slovenia and worldwide. They are medically redundant at best and often deter patients from effective innovative personalized therapy. They also exclude young patients from reasonable studies. Institutional review boards/ethics committees should be alerted, should critically review all ongoing pediatric studies, should suspend those found to be questionable, and should reject newly submitted questionable ones.

摘要

背景

美国和欧盟的儿科法律基于治疗孤儿概念推动行业资助的儿科研究,该概念声称儿童在药物治疗和药物研发中受到歧视。

目的

我们调查了在欧盟成员国斯洛文尼亚设有中心的国际儿科研究的医学有效性,并对其医学实用性提出质疑。

方法

我们分析了在www.ClinicalTrials.gov上列出的、在斯洛文尼亚设有中心的国际行业资助的儿科研究的医学价值。

结果

美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局发起的大多数儿科研究没有医学或科学价值。它们在形式上和监管上有正当理由,但缺乏医学意义,因此是不道德的。有几项研究甚至通过让患有严重疾病的儿童和/或青少年接受安慰剂或不合格治疗而对他们造成伤害。

结论

美国和欧盟监管要求引发的儿科研究严重滥用了斯洛文尼亚乃至全球的非新生儿儿童和青少年。这些研究充其量在医学上是多余的,而且常常阻碍患者接受有效的创新个性化治疗。它们还将年轻患者排除在合理的研究之外。机构审查委员会/伦理委员会应提高警惕,应严格审查所有正在进行的儿科研究,应暂停那些被发现有问题的研究,并应拒绝新提交的有问题的研究。

相似文献

1
Questionable Industry-Sponsored Postneonatal Pediatric Studies in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚存在问题的行业资助的新生儿期后儿科研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019 Jan 18;90:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019.
2
Pediatric Melanoma and Drug Development.小儿黑色素瘤与药物研发
Children (Basel). 2018 Mar 20;5(3):43. doi: 10.3390/children5030043.
3
The Challenges of Pediatric Drug Development.儿科药物研发的挑战。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019 Jan 26;90:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.01.007. eCollection 2019.
4
Too Many Avoidable Suicides Occur Worldwide in Young Patients.全球范围内,年轻患者中发生了太多可避免的自杀事件。
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2019 Oct 29;10(4):e0026. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10374.
5
Do the European Medicines Agency Decisions Hurt Pediatric Melanoma Patients?欧洲药品管理局的决定是否伤害了儿童黑色素瘤患者?
Clin Ther. 2017 Feb;39(2):253-265. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
The Meanings of "Pediatric Drug Development".“儿科药物研发”的含义
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;53(6):767-774. doi: 10.1177/2168479018812060. Epub 2018 Dec 9.
7
A New Ethical Challenge for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)/Ethics Committees (ECs) in the Assessment of Pediatric Clinical Trials.机构审查委员会(IRB)/伦理委员会(EC)在评估儿科临床试验中面临的新伦理挑战。
Children (Basel). 2015 May 28;2(2):198-210. doi: 10.3390/children2020198.
8
Neurology's vital role in preventing unnecessary and potentially harmful pediatric studies.神经病学在避免不必要且可能有害的儿科研究方面的重要作用。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2022 Mar;22(3):209-219. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2045953. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
9
Do Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs) Advance Paediatric Healthcare?儿科调查计划(PIPs)能否推动儿科医疗保健的发展?
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Dec;19(6):515-522. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0260-2.
10
The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia.欧洲药品管理局及其儿科委员会在抗击儿童白血病方面所做的贡献。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015 Nov 5;8:185-205. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S63029. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Harmonization of Pediatric Drug Development: Critical for Progress for Developing Safe and Effective Therapeutic Agents for Children.全球儿科药物研发协调统一:对开发安全有效的儿童治疗药物取得进展至关重要。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019 Jan 26;90:109-112. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.01.006. eCollection 2019.
2
Rational Use of Medicine in Children-The Conflict of Interests Story. A Review.儿童用药的合理使用——利益冲突故事。综述。
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2019 Jul 18;10(3):e0018. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10371.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric melanoma-The whole (conflicts of interest) story.儿童黑色素瘤——完整的(利益冲突)故事。
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018 Nov 19;5(2):110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.020. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
The Meanings of "Pediatric Drug Development".“儿科药物研发”的含义
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Nov;53(6):767-774. doi: 10.1177/2168479018812060. Epub 2018 Dec 9.
3
Most adolescents' melanomas are conventional malignant adult-type melanomas.大多数青少年的黑色素瘤是典型的成人型恶性黑色素瘤。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 May;95:117-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.080. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
4
Oral teriflunomide in the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis: clinical evidence and long-term experience.口服特立氟胺治疗复发型多发性硬化症:临床证据与长期经验
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017 Dec;10(12):381-396. doi: 10.1177/1756285617722500. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
5
Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus sitagliptin both in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.利拉鲁肽与西他列汀联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(39):e8161. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008161.
6
Enabling Development of Paediatric Medicines in Europe: 10 Years of the EU Paediatric Regulation.推动欧洲儿科药物的研发:欧盟儿科法规实施十年
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Dec;19(6):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0261-1.
7
Extrapolation of Efficacy in Pediatric Drug Development and Evidence-based Medicine: Progress and Lessons Learned.儿科药物研发中的疗效外推与循证医学:进展与经验教训
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017;2017:1-7. doi: 10.1177/2168479017725558. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
8
Do Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs) Advance Paediatric Healthcare?儿科调查计划(PIPs)能否推动儿科医疗保健的发展?
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Dec;19(6):515-522. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0260-2.
9
New developments in the management of partial-onset epilepsy: role of brivaracetam.部分性发作癫痫管理的新进展:布瓦西坦的作用
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Mar 6;11:643-657. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S103468. eCollection 2017.
10
Investigational drugs for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.用于治疗青少年特发性关节炎的研究性药物。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017 Apr;26(4):381-387. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1301929. Epub 2017 Mar 12.