• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经历动态风险与机遇的中心地觅食者的灵活资源利用策略。

Flexible resource use strategies of a central-place forager experiencing dynamic risk and opportunity.

作者信息

Hefty Kira L, Stewart Kelley M

机构信息

1Department of Biology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia St. Reno, Reno, NV 89557 USA.

2Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, 1064 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA.

出版信息

Mov Ecol. 2019 Aug 2;7:23. doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0168-2. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s40462-019-0168-2
PMID:31388428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6676571/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Movement decisions made in space and time define how wildlife meet competing extrinsic and intrinsic demands to maximize fitness. Differential selection of resource patches provides one example of how to measure how animals balance conflicting demands. We hypothesized that individual spatial selection of patch types between dynamic seasons would signify flexible strategies used to minimize risk and optimize foraging efforts.

METHODS

We used data collected from GPS loggers on golden-mantled ground squirrels () to model selection or avoidance of resources in two seasons of seed availability and one season in which no seeds were available. Movement decisions were measured in short-term discrete time intervals using high resolution location data. Selection or avoidance of specific resource features that entail fitness consequences were then assessed using resource selection functions.

RESULTS

Seasonality of food availability, food type, and spatial distribution of food largely influenced how individuals selected resources within their home ranges. Overall, when seeds were available, individuals mediated risks of predation and loss of food by using patches closer to refuge and selected intermediate distances to the burrow. When food was not available, individuals minimized exposure to heightened risk by staying close to the burrow and avoiding riskier patch types.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that individuals used flexible, dynamic strategies to select habitat patches which may allow them to balance conflicting seasonal demands. Advances in GPS technology for research of small mammals provide greater insight into how prey species in high risk environments differentially use resources to minimize risk and maintain fitness.

摘要

背景

在空间和时间上做出的移动决策决定了野生动物如何满足相互竞争的外在和内在需求,以实现适应性最大化。对资源斑块的差异选择提供了一个如何衡量动物如何平衡相互冲突的需求的例子。我们假设,在动态季节之间对斑块类型的个体空间选择将表明用于最小化风险和优化觅食努力的灵活策略。

方法

我们使用从金黄地松鼠()的GPS记录器收集的数据,对种子可获得的两个季节和一个无种子的季节中资源的选择或回避进行建模。使用高分辨率位置数据在短期离散时间间隔内测量移动决策。然后使用资源选择函数评估对具有适应性后果的特定资源特征的选择或回避。

结果

食物可获得性、食物类型和食物空间分布的季节性在很大程度上影响了个体在其家域内选择资源的方式。总体而言,当有种子时,个体通过使用更靠近避难所的斑块来调节被捕食和食物损失的风险,并选择到洞穴的中间距离。当没有食物时,个体通过靠近洞穴并避免风险更高的斑块类型来最小化暴露于更高风险的情况。

结论

结果表明,个体使用灵活、动态的策略来选择栖息地斑块,这可能使它们能够平衡相互冲突的季节性需求。用于小型哺乳动物研究的GPS技术的进步为高风险环境中的猎物物种如何差异利用资源以最小化风险和维持适应性提供了更深入的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64e/6676571/a8e2c281968a/40462_2019_168_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64e/6676571/b909c4ae4f1f/40462_2019_168_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64e/6676571/8102721ce7ac/40462_2019_168_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64e/6676571/a8e2c281968a/40462_2019_168_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64e/6676571/b909c4ae4f1f/40462_2019_168_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64e/6676571/8102721ce7ac/40462_2019_168_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64e/6676571/a8e2c281968a/40462_2019_168_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Flexible resource use strategies of a central-place forager experiencing dynamic risk and opportunity.经历动态风险与机遇的中心地觅食者的灵活资源利用策略。
Mov Ecol. 2019 Aug 2;7:23. doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0168-2. eCollection 2019.
2
Mallard resource selection trade-offs in a heterogeneous environment during autumn and winter.秋冬季节野鸭在异质环境中的资源选择权衡
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 6;9(4):1798-1808. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4864. eCollection 2019 Feb.
3
Balancing energy budget in a central-place forager: which habitat to select in a heterogeneous environment?在中心地觅食者中平衡能量预算:在异质环境中选择哪种栖息地?
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102162. eCollection 2014.
4
Selection of food patches by sympatric herbivores in response to concealment and distance from a refuge.同域食草动物对隐蔽物及与避难所距离的响应下的食物斑块选择
Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 22;6(9):2865-76. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1940. eCollection 2016 May.
5
Habitat selection in a fluctuating ground squirrel population: Density-dependence and fitness consequences.波动的地松鼠种群中的栖息地选择:密度依赖性与适合度后果
Ecol Evol. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e9241. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9241. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Indirect effects of prey swamping: differential seed predation during a bamboo masting event.猎物饱和的间接影响:竹子开花结实期的种子捕食差异
Ecology. 2007 Oct;88(10):2541-54. doi: 10.1890/06-1587.1.
7
Functional responses in animal movement explain spatial heterogeneity in animal-habitat relationships.动物运动中的功能反应解释了动物与栖息地关系中的空间异质性。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Jul;86(4):960-971. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12682. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Trade-Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison ().北美森林野牛冬季觅食策略中草料可获得性、可达性与被捕食风险之间的权衡() 。 (括号内内容原文缺失,翻译时保留原样)
Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 8;14(10):e70385. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70385. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Habitat predicts local prevalence of migratory behaviour in an alpine ungulate.栖息地预测高山有蹄类动物迁徙行为的局部流行程度。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Apr;89(4):1032-1044. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13167. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
Differential resource selection within shared habitat types across spatial scales in sympatric toads.同域蟾蜍在不同空间尺度的共享生境类型中对资源的差异选择。
Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3430-44. doi: 10.1890/08-0886.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Shrub avoidance by an open-adapted ground squirrel in a shrub-encroached environment.在灌丛入侵环境中,一种适应开阔环境的地松鼠避免灌丛。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 12;19(2):e0297993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297993. eCollection 2024.
2
Fine-scale foraging habitat selection by two diving central place foragers in the Northeast Atlantic.东北大西洋两种潜水中心地觅食者的精细觅食栖息地选择
Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 24;11(18):12349-12363. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7934. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Prey and habitat distribution are not enough to explain predator habitat selection: addressing intraspecific interactions, behavioural state and time.

本文引用的文献

1
Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals.将资源选择和步行动作选择模型联系起来,以研究动物的栖息地偏好。
Ecology. 2019 Jan;100(1):e02452. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2452. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
2
Covariance between predation risk and nutritional preferences confounds interpretations of giving-up density experiments.捕食风险和营养偏好之间的协变混淆了放弃密度实验的解释。
Ecology. 2018 Jul;99(7):1517-1522. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2365. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education.
猎物和栖息地分布不足以解释捕食者的栖息地选择:应对种内相互作用、行为状态和时间因素。
Mov Ecol. 2021 Mar 20;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40462-021-00250-0.
美国哺乳动物学会2016年关于在研究和教育中使用野生哺乳动物的指南。
J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078. Epub 2016 May 28.
4
The balancing act of foraging: mammalian herbivores trade-off multiple risks when selecting food patches.觅食的平衡行为:哺乳动物食草动物在选择食物斑块时要权衡多种风险。
Oecologia. 2017 Dec;185(4):537-549. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3957-6. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Complex variation in habitat selection strategies among individuals driven by extrinsic factors.外在因素驱动个体间栖息地选择策略的复杂变化。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 15;7(6):1802-1822. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2764. eCollection 2017 Mar.
6
Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee.最大化觅食效率并最小化暴露于捕食者的时间:黑顶山雀的一种权衡。
Oecologia. 1985 Apr;66(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00378552.
7
Caribou, water, and ice - fine-scale movements of a migratory arctic ungulate in the context of climate change.驯鹿、水和冰 - 气候变化背景下迁徙北极有蹄类动物的精细活动。
Mov Ecol. 2016 Apr 20;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s40462-016-0079-4. eCollection 2016.
8
Selection of food patches by sympatric herbivores in response to concealment and distance from a refuge.同域食草动物对隐蔽物及与避难所距离的响应下的食物斑块选择
Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 22;6(9):2865-76. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1940. eCollection 2016 May.
9
Foraging in groups affects giving-up densities: solo foragers quit sooner.群体觅食会影响放弃密度:单独觅食者更早放弃。
Oecologia. 2015 Jul;178(3):707-13. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3274-x. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Sexual segregation in North American elk: the role of density dependence.北美麋鹿的性别隔离:密度制约的作用。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Feb;5(3):709-21. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1397. Epub 2015 Jan 13.