Franco de Sá Gomes Camilla, Libdy Mylena Ranieri, Normando David
Department of Orthodontics, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Oct-Dec;9(4):331-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
To evaluate time, reliability and accuracy of craniofacial measurements with a 3D light scanner, considering prior demarcation of surface points on the face.
Eleven facial measurements of 15 volunteers were obtained by a scanner (Artec Eva TM) and by a caliper directly on the face, with or without demarcation of facial reference points. Inter and intra-method comparison were examined by intraclass correlation coefficient and analysis of random error by the Dahlberg formula. Agreement between the methods was analyzed by the Bland-Altman. A Wilcoxon test was used to compare the time for each method, at p < 0.05.
Marking points on the face improved accuracy for both methods. In the inter-methods analysis with landmarks, the scanner showed excellent reliability in all measures (ICC = 0.92-0.97, p < 0.0001). Measurements accuracy with scanner was around 2 mm when the points were not previously marked and about 1 mm when the points were marked. Measures taken with the scanner, however, took twice as long, compared with the direct method.
Craniofacial measurements obtained with scanner showed excellent reliability and accuracy, which qualifies this method for clinical and scientific use. Accuracy is improved when the points were previously marked on face. However, the time needed to obtain measurements is greater than about 4 min for the direct method.
考虑到面部表面点的预先标定,评估使用三维光扫描仪进行颅面测量的时间、可靠性和准确性。
15名志愿者的11项面部测量数据通过扫描仪(Artec Eva TM)以及直接使用卡尺在面部获取,测量时面部参考点有或没有进行标定。组内相关系数用于检验方法间和方法内的比较,Dahlberg公式用于分析随机误差。采用Bland-Altman分析方法间的一致性。使用Wilcoxon检验比较每种方法所需时间,p < 0.05。
面部标记点提高了两种方法的准确性。在有地标点的方法间分析中,扫描仪在所有测量中显示出极好的可靠性(组内相关系数ICC = 0.92 - 0.97,p < 0.0001)。当点未预先标记时,扫描仪测量的精度约为2毫米,当点被标记时约为1毫米。然而,与直接测量方法相比,使用扫描仪进行测量所需时间多出一倍。
用扫描仪获得的颅面测量结果显示出极好的可靠性和准确性,这使该方法适用于临床和科研。当预先在面部标记点时,准确性会提高。然而,使用扫描仪获取测量数据所需的时间比直接测量方法大约多4分钟。