Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Centre and Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
BJS Open. 2019 Mar 21;3(4):490-499. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50156. eCollection 2019 Aug.
This study evaluated the outcome and survival of patients with radiologically suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).
IPMN management was reviewed according to Fukuoka risk factors and IPMN localization, differentiating main-duct (MD), mixed-type (MT) and branch-duct (BD) IPMNs. Perioperative results were compared with those of patients undergoing resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) over the same interval (2010-2014). Overall (OS) and disease-specific (DSS) survival rates were calculated and subgroups compared.
Of 142 patients with IPMNs, 26 had MD-IPMN, eight had MT-IPMN and 108 had BD-IPMN. Some 74 per cent of patients with MD- and MT-IPMN were managed by primary resection, whereas this was used in only 27·8 per cent of those with BD-IPMN. The risk of secondary resection and malignant transformation for BD-IPMNs smaller than 20 mm was 8 and 2 per cent respectively during follow-up. Pancreatic head resection of IPMNs was associated with an increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C compared with resection of PDAC (12 of 33 (36 per cent) 41 of 221 (18·6 per cent) respectively; = 0·010), and greater morbidity and mortality (Clavien-Dindo grade III: 15 of 33 (45 per cent) 56 of 221 (25·3 per cent) respectively; grade IV: 1 (3 per cent) 7 (3·2 per cent); grade V: 2 (6 per cent) 2 (0·9 per cent); = 0·008). Five-year OS and DSS rates in patients with MD-IPMN were worse than those for MT- and BD-IPMN (OS: 44, 86 and 97·4 per cent respectively, < 0·001; DSS: 60, 100 and 98·6 per cent; < 0·001). Patients with invasive IPMN had worse OS and DSS rates than those with non-invasive dysplasia (OS: IPMN-carcinoma (10 patients) 33 per cent, high-grade dysplasia 100 per cent, intermediate-grade dysplasia 63 per cent, low grade-dysplasia 100 per cent, < 0·001; DSS: IPMN-carcinoma 43 per cent, all grades of dysplasia 100 per cent, < 0·001). Patients with high-risk stigmata had poorer survival than those without risk factors (OS: high-risk stigmata (35 patients) 55 per cent, worrisome features (31) 95 per cent, no risk factors (76) 100 per cent, < 0·001; DSS: 71, 100 and 100 per cent respectively, < 0·001).
The risk of malignant transformation was very low for BD-IPMNs, but the development of high-risk stigmata was associated with disease-specific mortality. Patients with IPMN had greater morbidity after resection than those having resection of PDAC.
本研究评估了影像学疑似胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMNs)患者的治疗结果和生存率。
根据福冈风险因素和 IPMN 定位,对 IPMN 管理进行回顾性分析,区分主胰管(MD)、混合型(MT)和分支胰管(BD)IPMN。比较了同一时期(2010-2014 年)接受胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)切除术的患者的围手术期结果。计算了总生存期(OS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)的生存率,并对亚组进行了比较。
142 例 IPMN 患者中,26 例为 MD-IPMN,8 例为 MT-IPMN,108 例为 BD-IPMN。74%的 MD-和 MT-IPMN 患者接受了初次切除术,而仅 27.8%的 BD-IPMN 患者接受了这种治疗。在随访期间,BD-IPMN 小于 20mm 时,二次切除和恶性转化的风险分别为 8%和 2%。与 PDAC 切除术相比,胰头 IPMN 切除术术后发生 B/C 级胰瘘的风险更高(33 例中的 12 例(36%)比 221 例中的 41 例(18.6%);=0.010),并且发病率和死亡率更高(Clavien-Dindo 分级 III:33 例中的 15 例(45%)比 221 例中的 56 例(25.3%);Ⅳ级:1 例(3%)比 7 例(3.2%);V 级:2 例(6%)比 2 例(0.9%);=0.008)。MD-IPMN 患者的 5 年 OS 和 DSS 率均差于 MT-和 BD-IPMN(OS:44%、86%和 97.4%;<0.001;DSS:60%、100%和 98.6%;<0.001)。侵袭性 IPMN 患者的 OS 和 DSS 率均差于非侵袭性异型增生(OS:IPMN-癌(10 例)33%,高级别异型增生 100%,中级别异型增生 63%,低级别异型增生 100%;<0.001;DSS:IPMN-癌 43%,所有级别异型增生 100%;<0.001)。高危特征患者的生存状况差于无危险因素患者(OS:高危特征(35 例)55%,可疑特征(31 例)95%,无危险因素(76 例)100%;<0.001;DSS:71、100 和 100%;<0.001)。
BD-IPMN 恶性转化的风险很低,但高危特征的出现与疾病特异性死亡率相关。与 PDAC 切除术相比,IPMN 患者术后发病率更高。