• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纪念症状评估-短表和简化纪念症状评估量表在评估肺癌患者中的作用和预后价值。

The usefulness and prognostic value of Memorial Symptom Assessment-Short Form and Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in assessment of lung cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey.

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):2005-2014. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05003-9. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-019-05003-9
PMID:31388746
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lung cancer is associated with high level of symptoms and patient-reported symptoms have been rarely used as a prognostic score to predict patients survival.

METHODS

Frequency and burden of symptoms in lung cancer patients were evaluated before the diagnosis with the Memorial Symptom Assessment-Short Form (MSAS-SF) and Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS) questionnaires. Performance status, stage of disease, serum albumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were recorded. Patients were staged according to 8th TNM classification. A survival analysis was applied.

RESULTS

The mean age of 116 patients (adenocarcinoma 51, squamous cell 43, non-small cell 5, small cell 17) was 65.2 ± 10.1 (28-87) years. The most common seen physical and psychological symptoms were cough (86.3%), lack of energy (74.3%), dyspnea (70.1%), and feeling sad (61.5%), feeling nervous (61.5%), and worrying (53.8%). Total and subscores of MSAS and CMSAS are significantly higher in M1 disease than M0 disease. All MSAS-SF and CMSAS scores, but not MSAS-PSYCH and CMSAS-PSYCH, positively correlated with age, high serum CRP, white blood cells/neutrophils counts, and TNM stage, and negatively correlated with albumin levels, performance status, and overall survival (OS). Median survival was 77, 195, 370, and 579 days for the four prognostic interquartile groups according to CMSAS-SUM score (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

MSAS-SF and CMSAS questionnaires can be useful tool for discriminating metastatic from non-metastatic disease in treatment-naïve patients with lung cancer. Since both questionnaires well correlated with OS and important prognostic factors, they can use to plan palliative care and to help for predicting survival of lung cancer patients.

摘要

目的

肺癌与高水平的症状相关,且患者报告的症状很少被用作预测患者生存的预后评分。

方法

使用简短版纪念症状评估量表(MSAS-SF)和简化版纪念症状评估量表(CMSAS)在肺癌患者被诊断之前评估症状的频率和负担。记录体能状态、疾病分期、血清白蛋白和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平。根据第 8 版 TNM 分类对患者进行分期。进行生存分析。

结果

116 例患者(腺癌 51 例、鳞癌 43 例、非小细胞癌 5 例、小细胞癌 17 例)的平均年龄为 65.2±10.1(28-87)岁。最常见的躯体和心理症状为咳嗽(86.3%)、乏力(74.3%)、呼吸困难(70.1%)、悲伤(61.5%)、紧张(61.5%)和担忧(53.8%)。M1 期患者的 MSAS 和 CMSAS 总分及各亚量表评分均显著高于 M0 期患者。MSAS-SF 和 CMSAS 评分的所有项目均与年龄、高血清 CRP、白细胞/中性粒细胞计数和 TNM 分期呈正相关,与白蛋白水平、体能状态和总生存期(OS)呈负相关,但 MSAS-PSYCH 和 CMSAS-PSYCH 评分除外。根据 CMSAS-SUM 评分,四个预后四分位组的中位生存时间分别为 77、195、370 和 579 天(p<0.0001)。

结论

MSAS-SF 和 CMSAS 问卷可作为区分初治肺癌转移与非转移患者的有用工具。由于这两个问卷与 OS 和重要预后因素均有良好的相关性,因此可用于计划姑息治疗并帮助预测肺癌患者的生存情况。

相似文献

1
The usefulness and prognostic value of Memorial Symptom Assessment-Short Form and Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in assessment of lung cancer patients.纪念症状评估-短表和简化纪念症状评估量表在评估肺癌患者中的作用和预后价值。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):2005-2014. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05003-9. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
The clinical utility of Memorial Symptom Assessment-Short Form and Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in Turkish lung cancer patients.纪念症状评估简表和精简版纪念症状评估量表在土耳其肺癌患者中的临床效用。
Clin Respir J. 2015 Apr;9(2):221-7. doi: 10.1111/crj.12127. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
3
New insights in symptom assessment: the Chinese Versions of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF) and the Condensed MSAS (CMSAS).症状评估的新见解:纪念症状评估量表简表(MSAS-SF)和精简版MSAS(CMSAS)的中文版
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Dec;36(6):584-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
4
Shorter symptom assessment instruments: the Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS).更简短的症状评估工具:简明纪念症状评估量表(CMSAS)。
Cancer Invest. 2004;22(4):526-36. doi: 10.1081/cnv-200026487.
5
Construct Validity of the Spanish Versions of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form and Condensed Form: Rasch Analysis of Responses in Oncology Outpatients.《纪念症状评估量表短式和简式西班牙文版的建构效度:肿瘤门诊患者反应的 Rasch 分析》
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jun;55(6):1480-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
6
The Impact of Baseline Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Scores on Treatment and Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.基线埃德蒙顿症状评估量表评分对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗和生存的影响。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Jan;19(1):e91-e99. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form in Gynecological Cancer Patients.韩国纪念症状评估量表-简表在妇科癌症患者中的信度和效度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jan;55(1):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form Among Cancer Patients.癌症患者简明症状评估量表简体中文版的验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF).简明纪念症状评估量表(MSAS-SF)。
Cancer. 2000 Sep 1;89(5):1162-71. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1162::aid-cncr26>3.0.co;2-y.
10
Does age influence the symptom experience of lung cancer patients prior to surgery?年龄会影响肺癌患者手术前的症状体验吗?
Lung Cancer. 2013 Oct;82(1):156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The chain mediating effect of spiritual well-being and anticipatory grief between benefit finding and meaning in life of patients with advanced lung cancer: Empirical research quantitative.灵性健康和预期悲伤在晚期肺癌患者的获益发现与生命意义之间的中介作用链:实证研究定量分析。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jul;11(7):e2179. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2179.
2
Developing a Card Game for Assessment and Intervention in the Person and the Family in Palliative Care: "".开发一种用于姑息治疗中个体和家庭评估及干预的卡牌游戏:“”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1449. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021449.
3
Evaluating a couple communication skills training (CCST) intervention for advanced cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of baseline symptom burden in treatment-naïve patients with lung cancer: an observational study.治疗初治肺癌患者基线症状负担的评估:一项观察性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Sep;27(9):3439-3447. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4632-0. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
2
Elongation factor-2 kinase (eEF-2K) expression is associated with poor patient survival and promotes proliferation, invasion and tumor growth of lung cancer.伸长因子-2 激酶 (eEF-2K) 的表达与患者预后不良相关,并促进肺癌的增殖、侵袭和肿瘤生长。
Lung Cancer. 2018 Oct;124:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.027. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
3
Low pre-treatment nutritional index is significantly related to poor outcomes in small cell lung cancer.
评估针对晚期癌症的夫妻沟通技巧培训 (CCST) 干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Aug 26;23(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06656-4.
低治疗前营养指数与小细胞肺癌不良预后显著相关。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Nov;9(11):1483-1491. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12862. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review.患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)在肺癌管理中的应用:系统评价。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;113:140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
5
Test-retest reliability of Brazilian version of Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale for assessing symptoms in cancer patients.用于评估癌症患者症状的巴西版纪念症状评估量表的重测信度。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):148-154. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3645.
6
The Impact of Baseline Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Scores on Treatment and Survival in Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.基线埃德蒙顿症状评估量表评分对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗和生存的影响。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Jan;19(1):e91-e99. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
7
Pattern and Predictors of Unmet Supportive Care Needs in Cancer Patients.癌症患者未满足的支持性护理需求模式及预测因素
Cureus. 2017 May 9;9(5):e1234. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1234.
8
A New Inflammatory Prognostic Index, Based on C-reactive Protein, the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Serum Albumin is Useful for Predicting Prognosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cases.一种基于C反应蛋白、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血清白蛋白的新型炎症预后指数,可用于预测非小细胞肺癌患者的预后。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):5101-5106. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.12.5101.
9
TNF-α and cancer cachexia: Molecular insights and clinical implications.TNF-α 与癌症恶病质:分子见解与临床意义。
Life Sci. 2017 Feb 1;170:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
10
Ratio of C-reactive protein to albumin is a prognostic factor for operable non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients.C反应蛋白与白蛋白的比值是老年可手术非小细胞肺癌患者的一个预后因素。
Surg Today. 2017 Jul;47(7):836-843. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1448-8. Epub 2016 Nov 16.