Suppr超能文献

胆管损伤:外科医生态度和经验的当代调查。

Bile duct injuries: a contemporary survey of surgeon attitudes and experiences.

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W Congress Parkway, Jelke 7, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3079-3084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07056-7. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not changed significantly in the past 2 decades despite increased operative experience and technical refinement. We sought to evaluate surgeon-specific factors associated with BDI and to assess how surgeons manage injuries.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to surgeons belonging to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons via e-mail. Survey items included personal experience with BDI and how injuries were addressed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors associated with BDI.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 3411 surgeons with 559 complete responses (16.5%). The mean age of respondents was 48.7 years with an average time in practice of 16.1 years. Most respondents (61.2%) had fellowship training. Forty-seven percent of surgeons surveyed experienced a BDI in their career with 17.1% of surgeons experiencing multiple BDIs. The majority of BDIs were identified in the operating room (64.5%); most injuries (66.9%) were repaired immediately. When repair was undertaken immediately, 77.4% of these repairs were performed in an open technique. A majority of surgeons (57.7%) felt that BDIs could theoretically be repaired laparoscopically and 25% of those surgeons had done so in practice. In multivariate logistic regression, any type of fellowship training was associated with a decreased risk of BDI (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76). Compared with those in non-academic practice, surgeons in academic practice were at a significantly decreased risk of having experienced a BDI (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92).

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of those surveyed, experienced a BDI during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Community and private practice setting were associated with an increased risk of BDI, while fellowship training and academic practice setting conferred a protective effect. A majority of surgeons felt that BDI could be repaired laparoscopically and 25% had done so in practice.

摘要

简介

尽管腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术经验和技术不断提高,但在过去的 20 年中,胆管损伤(BDI)的发生率并没有明显变化。我们旨在评估与 BDI 相关的外科医生特定因素,并评估外科医生如何处理损伤。

方法

通过电子邮件向美国胃肠内镜外科医生协会的外科医生发送在线调查。调查项目包括个人 BDI 经验以及如何处理伤害。进行统计分析以确定与 BDI 相关的因素。

结果

这项调查发送给了 3411 名外科医生,其中有 559 名外科医生完成了调查(占 16.5%)。受访者的平均年龄为 48.7 岁,平均从业时间为 16.1 年。大多数受访者(61.2%)接受过专科培训。47%的调查外科医生在其职业生涯中经历过 BDI,其中 17.1%的外科医生经历过多次 BDI。大多数 BDI 是在手术室中发现的(64.5%);大多数损伤(66.9%)立即得到修复。当立即进行修复时,77.4%的这些修复是在开放技术下进行的。大多数外科医生(57.7%)认为 BDI 在理论上可以通过腹腔镜进行修复,其中 25%的外科医生在实践中已经这样做了。在多变量逻辑回归中,任何类型的专科培训都与 BDI 的风险降低相关(OR 0.51,95%CI 0.34-0.76)。与非学术实践相比,学术实践中的外科医生发生 BDI 的风险显著降低(OR 0.62,95%CI 0.42-0.92)。

结论

在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的外科医生中,近一半的人经历过 BDI。社区和私人执业环境与 BDI 的风险增加相关,而专科培训和学术实践环境则具有保护作用。大多数外科医生认为 BDI 可以通过腹腔镜进行修复,其中 25%的外科医生已经在实践中这样做了。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验