• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西贝洛奥里藏特市老年人对在家中离世的偏好及相关因素

Preference for death at home and associated factors among older people in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

作者信息

Jorge Rafaela, Calanzani Natália, Freitas Adelaide, Nunes Rui, Sousa Liliana

机构信息

Doctoral Program in Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Aveiro. Campus Universitário de Santiago. 3810-193 Portugal.

Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Aug 5;24(8):3001-3012. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018248.24102017.

DOI:10.1590/1413-81232018248.24102017
PMID:31389547
Abstract

We examined people's preferences for place of death and identified factors associated with a home death preference. We asked a representative sample (N = 400) of older people (≥ 60 years) residents in the city of Belo Horizonte, about their preferences for place of death in a situation of serious illness with less than a year to live. Data were analyzed using binomial regression to identify associated factors. 52.2% indicate home as the preferred place of death. Five variables were associated with preference for death at home: those living with 1 child (odds ratio (OR)0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.18-0.92; ref: without children); being in education for up to 4 years (OR0.42; 95% CI:0.20-0.89; ref: higher education); finding it difficult to live with the present income (OR3.18; 95% CI:1.53-6.62; ref: living comfortably); self-assessed fair overall health (OR2.07; 95% CI:1.06-4.03; ref: very good health) and selecting "choosing who makes decisions about your care" as the care priority that would matter to them the most (OR2.43; 95%CI:1.34-4.40; ref: dying in the place you want). Most respondents chose home as preferred place of death. However, most residents of Belo Horizonte die in hospitals, suggesting that preferences are not being considered.

摘要

我们研究了人们对死亡地点的偏好,并确定了与在家中死亡偏好相关的因素。我们询问了贝洛奥里藏特市400名年龄在60岁及以上的老年人的代表性样本,了解他们在患有严重疾病且预期寿命不到一年的情况下对死亡地点的偏好。使用二项式回归分析数据以确定相关因素。52.2%的人表示希望在家中死亡。有五个变量与在家中死亡的偏好相关:与一个孩子同住(优势比(OR)0.41;95%置信区间(CI):0.18 - 0.92;参照:无子女);接受教育年限达4年(OR0.42;95%CI:0.20 - 0.89;参照:高等教育);认为以目前的收入难以维持生活(OR3.18;95%CI:1.53 - 6.62;参照:生活舒适);自我评估总体健康状况一般(OR2.07;95%CI:1.06 - 4.03;参照:非常健康)以及选择“选择谁来决定你的护理”作为对他们最重要的护理优先事项(OR2.43;95%CI:1.34 - 4.40;参照:在你希望的地方去世)。大多数受访者选择在家中作为首选的死亡地点。然而,贝洛奥里藏特的大多数居民在医院死亡,这表明他们的偏好未被考虑。

相似文献

1
Preference for death at home and associated factors among older people in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.巴西贝洛奥里藏特市老年人对在家中离世的偏好及相关因素
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Aug 5;24(8):3001-3012. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018248.24102017.
2
Older people's preferences for prognostic information in a situation of serious illness with less than a year to live.老年人对身患重病且预期寿命不足一年情况下预后信息的偏好。
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Oct 28;24(11):4313-4324. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182411.02022018. eCollection 2019.
3
Determinants of preference for home death among terminally ill patients with cancer in Taiwan: a cross-sectional survey study.台湾地区癌症末期病患对居家死亡偏好之决定因素:一项横断面调查研究。
J Nurs Res. 2014 Mar;22(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000016.
4
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
5
Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries.将养老院选为最不愿离世的场所:一项对七个欧洲国家公众偏好的跨国调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Oct 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-48.
6
Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill cancer patients.影响终末期癌症患者在家中死亡的因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010 Apr;10(2):154-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00570.x.
7
Preference for place of death in Germany.德国的死亡地点偏好。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;14(10):1097-103. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0136.
8
Preferred Place of Care and Death in Terminally Ill Patients with Lung and Heart Disease Compared to Cancer Patients.与癌症患者相比,晚期肺病和心脏病患者的首选护理地点和死亡地点
J Palliat Med. 2017 Nov;20(11):1217-1224. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0082. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
9
Predictors of home being the preferred place of death among Japanese older people: JAGES cross-sectional study.预测日本老年人将家作为首选死亡地点的因素:JAGES 横断面研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Apr;21(4):345-352. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14135. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
Priorities for treatment, care and information if faced with serious illness: a comparative population-based survey in seven European countries.面对严重疾病时的治疗、护理及信息获取优先事项:一项在七个欧洲国家开展的基于人群的比较性调查
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):101-10. doi: 10.1177/0269216313488989. Epub 2013 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender disparities in end-of-life care: A scoping review of patient, caregiver and care provider perspectives in low-and middle-income countries.临终关怀中的性别差异:对低收入和中等收入国家患者、照料者及护理提供者观点的范围综述
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 10;24(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01702-9.