Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep.
Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Baskent University, Adana.
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;33(2):E81-E86. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000858.
This was a retrospective analysis.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the 4 different scoring systems Tomita, Bauer modified, Tokuhashi revised, and Van der Linden and some parameters that are used in these scoring systems.
Prediction of the survival period before treatment for spinal metastasis is extremely important. A lot of scoring systems have been described to predict the survival periods and to select the ideal treatment modality in the literature.
Retrospectively 146 patients with spinal metastasis were investigated between 2002 and 2011. The following parameters were analyzed: age, pathologic vertebra fracture, neurological deficit, visceral metastasis, diagnosis of primary tumor and its spinal metastasis interval, other skeletal metastasis, involved region of vertebra, and undergone spinal surgery. Patients were also scored by the 4 different scoring systems. The survival period was calculated from date of diagnosis of the spinal metastasis to the date of death or last follow-up (minimum: 12 mo). Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival test, and Cronbach α tests were performed for statistical analysis.
Median overall survival for all patients was 13 months (range: 1-68 mo). The primary tumor (P=0.015), existence of visceral metastasis (P=0.017), presence of pathologic vertebra fracture (P=0.009), and undergone spinal surgery (P=0.047) showed significant influence on survival. Each scoring system was reliable and concordant with the other scoring systems (Cronbach α=80%); however, after 2 years, Modified Bauer score appeared to be the most reliable system for predicting survival (Cronbach α=25%).
According to this analysis, lung cancer, visceral metastasis, pathologic vertebra fracture, and undergone spinal surgery have shown a negative effect on survival. All 4 scoring systems were reliable for predicting survival of patients with spinal metastatic disease. However, modified Bauer scoring system seems to be more predictive after 2 years.
Level III.
这是一项回顾性分析。
本研究的目的是评估 Tomita、Bauer 改良、Tokuhashi 修订、Van der Linden 等 4 种评分系统以及这些评分系统中使用的一些参数的预测价值。
在治疗脊柱转移之前预测生存期间是极其重要的。为了预测生存期间和选择理想的治疗方式,文献中已经描述了很多评分系统。
回顾性调查了 2002 年至 2011 年间的 146 例脊柱转移患者。分析了以下参数:年龄、病理性椎骨骨折、神经功能缺损、内脏转移、原发肿瘤诊断及其脊柱转移间隔、其他骨骼转移、受累椎体区域、以及脊柱手术。患者还接受了 4 种不同评分系统的评分。从脊柱转移诊断日期到死亡或最后一次随访日期(最短:12 个月)计算生存期间。进行 Cox 回归、Kaplan-Meier 生存检验和 Cronbach α 检验进行统计学分析。
所有患者的中位总生存时间为 13 个月(范围:1-68 个月)。原发肿瘤(P=0.015)、存在内脏转移(P=0.017)、病理性椎骨骨折(P=0.009)和脊柱手术(P=0.047)对生存有显著影响。每个评分系统都是可靠的,与其他评分系统一致(Cronbach α=80%);然而,2 年后,改良 Bauer 评分似乎是预测生存的最可靠系统(Cronbach α=25%)。
根据这项分析,肺癌、内脏转移、病理性椎骨骨折和脊柱手术对生存有负面影响。所有 4 种评分系统对预测脊柱转移疾病患者的生存都可靠。然而,改良 Bauer 评分在 2 年后似乎更具预测性。
III 级。