University Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Nursing Sciences Research chair, Laboratory Educations and Health Practices (LEPS), (EA 3412), UFR SMBH, F-93017 Bobigny, France.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP HP), Nursing sciences Research Chair, 75004 Paris, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 7;16(16):2812. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162812.
Public involvement (PI) is of great interest. However, little is known about this topic in the design, development, and/or implementation of health interventions in geriatric facilities. This study aimed to provide a critical overview of the involvement of caregivers and end-users in interventions in these facilities, based on Rifkin's analytical framework. This systematic review, supplemented by a questionnaire to the corresponding authors, covered non-drug intervention reports targeting nurses, doctors, residents, and their relatives. Articles were published in Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, and Cinahl, from January 2016 to April 2018. Ninety-seven articles were included. The review shows a low level or partial PI in geriatric facilities where it exists. These results are further supported by the authors' responses to the questionnaire. PI remains uncommon in geriatric institutions and consists of a consumerist model, suggesting the need for improved practices. More efforts are needed to experiment with recommendations to meet the challenges of PI and enhance the public ownership of interventions. The protocol was registered on Prospero under the number CRD42018098504.
公众参与(PI)备受关注。然而,在老年护理机构中,针对健康干预措施的设计、开发和/或实施,人们对此知之甚少。本研究旨在根据 Rifkin 的分析框架,对护理人员和终端用户在这些设施中的干预措施中的参与情况进行批判性概述。该系统评价通过向相应作者发送问卷进行了补充,涵盖了针对护士、医生、居民及其亲属的非药物干预报告。文章发表在 Pubmed、Medline、Scopus 和 Cinahl 上,时间为 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月。共纳入 97 篇文章。综述表明,在存在公众参与的老年护理机构中,公众参与程度较低或仅为部分参与。作者对调查问卷的回答进一步支持了这些结果。PI 在老年机构中仍然不常见,其形式为消费者模式,表明需要改进实践。需要进一步努力尝试建议,以应对 PI 的挑战,并增强干预措施的公众所有权。该方案已在 Prospero 上根据 CRD42018098504 号进行了注册。