Nápravníková J, Petrtýl M, Stupka R, Vadlejch J
Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
Vet Parasitol. 2019 Aug;272:53-57. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
The detection and quantification of nematode eggs using fecal egg count techniques have an irreplaceable role in equine parasitic control. The reliability, particularly precision and accuracy, of individual techniques have been described only for strongylid infections. The aim of this study was to compare three fecal egg count techniques used for the detection of the two most common equine nematode infections: strongylid and ascarid. The Simple McMaster, Concentration McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC techniques were tested on spiked fecal samples with various levels of egg concentration (50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 and 3000 eggs per gram) and naturally infected mixed strongylid-ascarid samples with 30 replicates. The Simple McMaster, Concentration McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC techniques had precision coefficients of variation of 44.33, 35.64 and 18.25% for the strongylid infection and 62.95, 35.71 and 18.95% for the ascarid infection, and percent accuracies (mean count/number of eggs spiked) of 97.53, 88.39 and 74.18% for the strongylid infection and 65.53, 83.18 and 90.28% for the ascarid infection, respectively. Accuracy depended greatly on the type of nematode, but precision did not. The Mini-FLOTAC technique was more precise than the Simple and Concentration McMaster techniques regardless of nematode type. Simple McMaster was the most accurate technique for detecting strongylid eggs, and Mini-FLOTAC was the most accurate technique for detecting ascarid eggs. Our results indicated that none of the current techniques were universally and sufficiently reliable for the simultaneous quantification of both of these common equine nematodes.
使用粪便虫卵计数技术来检测和定量线虫卵,在马寄生虫控制中具有不可替代的作用。目前仅针对圆线虫感染描述了各种技术的可靠性,尤其是精密度和准确性。本研究的目的是比较三种用于检测两种最常见马线虫感染(圆线虫和蛔虫)的粪便虫卵计数技术。对添加了不同虫卵浓度(每克50、100、200、500、1000和3000个卵)的粪便样本以及自然感染的混合圆线虫-蛔虫样本进行了30次重复检测,测试了简易麦克马斯特法、浓缩麦克马斯特法和Mini-FLOTAC技术。对于圆线虫感染,简易麦克马斯特法、浓缩麦克马斯特法和Mini-FLOTAC技术的变异系数分别为44.33%、35.64%和18.25%;对于蛔虫感染,变异系数分别为62.95%、35.71%和18.95%。圆线虫感染的百分准确率(平均计数/添加的虫卵数)分别为97.53%、88.39%和74.18%,蛔虫感染的百分准确率分别为65.53%、83.18%和90.28%。准确性在很大程度上取决于线虫的类型,但精密度并非如此。无论线虫类型如何,Mini-FLOTAC技术都比简易和浓缩麦克马斯特技术更精确。简易麦克马斯特法是检测圆线虫卵最准确的技术,而Mini-FLOTAC是检测蛔虫卵最准确的技术。我们的结果表明,目前没有一种技术对于同时定量这两种常见的马线虫具有普遍且足够的可靠性。