Ghafar Abdul, Abbas Ghazanfar, King Justine, Jacobson Caroline, Hughes Kristopher J, El-Hage Charles, Beasley Anne, Bauquier Jenni, Wilkes Edwina J A, Hurley John, Cudmore Lucy, Carrigan Peter, Tennent-Brown Brett, Nielsen Martin K, Gauci Charles G, Beveridge Ian, Jabbar Abdul
Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2021 Aug 9;1:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2021.100046. eCollection 2021.
Faecal egg counting techniques (FECT) form the cornerstone for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites in equines. For this purpose, several flotation, centrifugation, image- and artificial intelligence-based techniques are used, with varying levels of performance. This review aimed to critically appraise the literature on the assessment and comparison of various coprological techniques and/or modifications of these techniques used for equines and to identify the knowledge gaps and future research directions. We searched three databases for published scientific studies on the assessment and comparison of FECT in equines and included 27 studies in the final synthesis. Overall, the performance parameters of McMaster (81.5%), Mini-FLOTAC® (33.3%) and simple flotation (25.5%) techniques were assessed in most of the studies, with 77.8% of them comparing the performance of at least two or three methods. The detection of strongyle, spp. and cestode eggs was assessed for various FECT in 70.4%, 18.5% and 18.5% studies, respectively. A sugar-based flotation solution with a specific gravity of ≥1.2 was found to be the optimal flotation solution for parasitic eggs in the majority of FECT. No uniform or standardised protocol was followed for the comparison of various FECT, and the tested sample size (i.e. equine population and faecal samples) also varied substantially across all studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to evaluate studies on the comparison of FECT in equines and it highlights important knowledge gaps in the evaluation and comparison of such techniques.
粪便虫卵计数技术(FECT)是检测马胃肠道寄生虫的基石。为此,人们使用了几种基于浮选、离心、图像和人工智能的技术,其性能水平各不相同。本综述旨在批判性地评估有关评估和比较用于马的各种粪便学技术和/或这些技术的改良方法的文献,并确定知识空白和未来的研究方向。我们在三个数据库中搜索了关于马FECT评估和比较的已发表科学研究,并在最终的综合分析中纳入了27项研究。总体而言,大多数研究评估了麦克马斯特法(81.5%)、Mini-FLOTAC®法(33.3%)和简单浮选法(25.5%)的性能参数,其中77.8%的研究比较了至少两种或三种方法的性能。分别在70.4%、18.5%和18.5%的研究中评估了各种FECT对圆线虫属虫卵、绦虫卵的检测情况。在大多数FECT中,发现比重≥1.2的糖基浮选液是寄生虫卵的最佳浮选液。在比较各种FECT时,没有遵循统一或标准化的方案,而且所有研究中测试的样本量(即马的数量和粪便样本)也有很大差异。据我们所知,这是第一项评估马FECT比较研究的系统综述,它突出了此类技术评估和比较方面的重要知识空白。