School of Engineering, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Acta Biomater. 2019 Oct 1;97:587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
The present study investigates the nanoindentation behavior, wear resistance and in vitro biocompatibility of SLM manufactured CP-Ti and EBM manufactured Ti64 gyroid scaffolds and the results were compared to those of casting CP-Ti. Both the SLM- and EBM manufactured scaffolds exhibited anisotropic properties with higher reduced modulus (up to 10%) and nanohardness (up to 30%) in the transverse direction than those in building direction. The wear resistance of scaffolds in transverse direction was higher than those of in building direction by up to ∼25% and ∼82% for SLM manufactured CP-Ti and EBM manufactured Ti64 scaffolds, respectively. The SLM manufactured CP-Ti scaffolds displayed significant enhancement in wear resistance over cast dense CP-Ti with 75% lower mean worn height during a nanowear test. The coefficient of friction was varied between 0.11 and 0.24 and exhibited a steady mean value of 0.15-0.18 for CP-Ti and Ti64 scaffolds, respectively. During in vitro cell culture study, CP-Ti scaffolds showed higher cell viability and cell adhesion density in comparison to Ti64 scaffolds for all unit cell sizes. Moreover, cell adhesion density of scaffolds with smaller unit cell sizes (G2) are lower than those of larger unit cells (G3). SEM observations confirmed that both the inner space and surfaces of gyroid scaffolds provided a suitable environment for cell migration, attachment and proliferation after cell culture for 7 d. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: It is essential to evaluate the properties of EBM/SLM manufactured scaffolds and to determine whether they can meet the tough performance requirements of the biomedical industry. In this study, nanoindentation and nanowear properties of SLM manufactured CP-Ti and EBM manufactured Ti64 gyroid scaffolds with different unit cell sizes and sample orientations were evaluated and compared to cast dense CP-Ti samples. Moreover, the in vitro biocompatibility of the scaffolds was assessed and compared to each other. To our best of knowledge, this type of study on EBM/SLM manufactured CP-Ti and Ti64 scaffolds have not been reported, to date.
本研究考察了 SLM 制造的 CP-Ti 和 EBM 制造的 Ti64 胞元支架的纳米压痕行为、耐磨性和体外生物相容性,并将结果与铸造 CP-Ti 进行了比较。SLM 和 EBM 制造的支架都表现出各向异性,在横向方向的弹性模量(高达 10%)和纳米硬度(高达 30%)比在构建方向高。支架在横向方向的耐磨性比在构建方向高,SLM 制造的 CP-Ti 和 EBM 制造的 Ti64 支架分别高达约 25%和 82%。SLM 制造的 CP-Ti 支架在纳米磨损试验中显示出比铸造致密 CP-Ti 高 75%的耐磨性,平均磨损高度低 75%。摩擦系数在 0.11 和 0.24 之间变化,CP-Ti 和 Ti64 支架的摩擦系数分别稳定在 0.15-0.18 之间。在体外细胞培养研究中,CP-Ti 支架的细胞活力和细胞附着密度均高于 Ti64 支架,所有单元胞尺寸。此外,具有较小单元胞尺寸(G2)的支架的细胞附着密度低于较大单元胞(G3)的支架。SEM 观察证实,胞元支架的内空间和表面在细胞培养 7 天后为细胞迁移、附着和增殖提供了合适的环境。 意义声明:评估 EBM/SLM 制造的支架的性能并确定它们是否能满足生物医学工业的严格性能要求是至关重要的。在这项研究中,评估了不同单元胞尺寸和样品取向的 SLM 制造的 CP-Ti 和 EBM 制造的 Ti64 胞元支架的纳米压痕和纳米磨损性能,并与铸造致密 CP-Ti 样品进行了比较。此外,还评估和比较了支架的体外生物相容性。据我们所知,到目前为止,还没有关于 EBM/SLM 制造的 CP-Ti 和 Ti64 支架的这种类型的研究。