Lee Jae-Hyun, Yun Je-Hyeon, Han Jung-Suk, Yeo In-Sung Luke, Yoon Hyung-In
Department of Prosthodontics, One-Stop Specialty Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Daehak-ro 101, Jongro-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Daehak-ro 101, Jongro-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 8;8(8):1187. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081187.
Research on whether the number or location of missing teeth affects the accuracy of intraoral scanners in partial edentulous patients is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the precision of complete-arch scan data of various partial edentulous arches acquired by intraoral scanners. Five different maxillary models were scanned using Carestream CS3600 and Medit i500 scanners. The models employed here were control: Fully dentate; Case 1: Missing a right second premolar and a first molar; Case 2: Missing a right second premolar, a first molar, both left premolars, and a left first molar; Case 3: Missing four incisors and a right canine; and Case 4: Missing four incisors, a left second premolar, and a first molar. Six scans per group were performed and the resulting two datasets were paired to analyze the precision of each group ( = 15). Two-way ANOVA was performed (α = 0.05). The root mean square (RMS) error values in Cases 2, 3, and 4 were significantly higher than those in Case 1 and control. The RMS values of the two intraoral scanners were not significantly different. Scanning precision was significantly lower for both devices when used for scanning dental arches with ≥5 missing teeth.
关于缺牙数量或位置是否会影响口腔扫描仪在部分牙列缺损患者中准确性的研究很少。本研究旨在评估口腔扫描仪获取的各种部分牙列缺损牙弓的全牙弓扫描数据的精度。使用Carestream CS3600和Medit i500扫描仪对五种不同的上颌模型进行扫描。这里使用的模型为:对照:全口牙齿完整;病例1:缺失一颗右第二前磨牙和一颗第一磨牙;病例2:缺失一颗右第二前磨牙、一颗第一磨牙、两颗左前磨牙和一颗左第一磨牙;病例3:缺失四颗切牙和一颗右尖牙;病例4:缺失四颗切牙、一颗左第二前磨牙和一颗第一磨牙。每组进行六次扫描,将得到的两个数据集配对以分析每组的精度(=15)。进行双向方差分析(α=0.05)。病例2、3和4中的均方根(RMS)误差值显著高于病例1和对照中的误差值。两种口腔扫描仪的RMS值无显著差异。当用于扫描缺失≥5颗牙齿的牙弓时,两种设备的扫描精度均显著降低。