Suppr超能文献

针刀与针灸治疗神经根型颈椎病的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Acupotomy versus acupuncture for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.

Graduate School, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 8;9(8):e029052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029052.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is the most common pattern of cervical spondylosis, which is a serious and common degenerative disease. Both acupotomy and acupuncture have been widely used clinically to treat CSR in China with satisfied efficacy. However, there is no systematic review comparing the effectiveness of these two therapies. The aim of this study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety between acupotomy and acupuncture for patients with CSR to provide evidence for clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The following electronic databases will be searched: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure , China Biology Medicine disc, Wanfang Database and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP). The randomised controlled trials of acupotomy versus acupuncture with/without additional treatment for CSR will be searched in the databases from their inception to December 2018 by two researchers independently. Visual analogue scale, symptom score and neck disability index will be assessed as the primary outcomes. The total effective rate, curative rate, adverse events and amount of rescue medication used will be assessed as the secondary outcomes. The Review Manager 5.3 will be used for meta-analysis and the evidence level will be assessed by using the method for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Continuous outcomes will be presented as the weighted mean difference or standardised mean difference with 95% CI, whereas dichotomous data will be expressed as relative risk with 95% CI. If the included studies have existing heterogeneity (p<0.05), then a random-effects model will be used. Otherwise, we will calculate using a fixed-effects model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because no primary data are collected. This review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at an international academic conference for dissemination.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019117348.

摘要

简介

颈椎神经根型颈椎病(CSR)是颈椎病最常见的类型,是一种严重且常见的退行性疾病。针刀和针灸在中国临床上都被广泛用于治疗 CSR,疗效满意。然而,目前还没有系统评价比较这两种疗法的疗效。本研究旨在比较针刀与针灸治疗 CSR 患者的疗效和安全性,为临床实践提供证据。

方法和分析

将在以下电子数据库中搜索:Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、中国国家知识基础设施、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库和中国科学期刊数据库(VIP)。由两名研究人员独立从数据库建立到 2018 年 12 月搜索针刀与针灸与/或附加治疗 CSR 的随机对照试验。视觉模拟评分、症状评分和颈部残疾指数将作为主要结局进行评估。总有效率、治愈率、不良事件和使用的抢救药物量将作为次要结局进行评估。使用 Review Manager 5.3 进行荟萃分析,并使用推荐评估、制定和评价的方法评估证据水平。连续结果将以加权均数差或标准化均数差及其 95%置信区间表示,而二分类数据将以相对风险及其 95%置信区间表示。如果纳入的研究存在异质性(p<0.05),则使用随机效应模型。否则,我们将使用固定效应模型进行计算。

伦理和传播

由于不收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理批准。本综述将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并将在国际学术会议上发表,以进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019117348。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ec/6701683/49efa90e8c21/bmjopen-2019-029052f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验