Dalla Keti, Bech-Hanssen Odd, Ricksten Sven-Erik
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2019 Aug 10;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12947-019-0165-z.
Myocardial deformation imaging using speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess global longitudinal strain (GLS) is today considered a more sensitive measure of left ventricular (LV) systolic function than ejection fraction. General anesthesia and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) are known to change the right ventricular (RV) and LV loading conditions. However, little is known about the effects of anesthesia and PPV on RV free wall and LV GLS. We studied the influence of general anesthesia and PPV on RV and LV longitudinal strain in patients without myocardial disease.
Twenty-one patients scheduled for non-cardiac surgery were included. The baseline examination was performed on the un-premedicated patients within 60 min of anesthesia. The second examination was performed 10-15 min after induction of anesthesia (propofol, remifentanil), intubation and start of PPV. The examinations included apical four-, two- and three-chamber projections, mitral and aortic Doppler flow velocities and tissue Doppler velocities of tricuspid and mitral annulus. LV end-systolic elastance (Ees) and aortic elastance were determined (Ea).
General anesthesia and PPV reduced the mean arterial blood pressure (- 29%, p < 0.0019), stroke volume index (- 13%, p < 0.001) and cardiac index (- 23%, p < 0.001). RV end-diastolic area index and LV end-diastolic volume index decreased significantly, while systemic vascular resistance was not significantly affected. Ees decreased significantly with the induction of anaesthesia (- 23%, p = 0.002), while there was a trend for a decrease in Ea (p = 0.053). The ventriculo-arterial coupling, Ea/Ees, was not significantly affected by the anesthetics and PPV. The LV GLS decreased from - 19.1 ± 2.3% to - 17.3 ± 2.9% (p < 0.001) and RV free wall strain decreased from - 26.5 ± 3.9% to - 24.1 ± 4.2% (p = 0.001). One patient (5%) had at baseline a LV GLS > - 16% compared with 6 patients (28%) during general anesthesia and PPV. Three patients (14%) had a RV free wall strain > - 24% compared to 8 patients (38%) during general anesthesia and PPV.
General anesthesia and PPV reduces systolic LV and RV function to levels considered indicating dysfunction in a substantial proportion of patients without myocardial disease.
如今,使用斑点追踪超声心动图评估整体纵向应变(GLS)的心肌变形成像被认为是比射血分数更敏感的左心室(LV)收缩功能测量方法。已知全身麻醉和正压通气(PPV)会改变右心室(RV)和左心室的负荷条件。然而,关于麻醉和PPV对右心室游离壁和左心室GLS的影响知之甚少。我们研究了全身麻醉和PPV对无心肌疾病患者右心室和左心室纵向应变的影响。
纳入21例计划进行非心脏手术的患者。在麻醉后60分钟内对未使用术前药的患者进行基线检查。在麻醉诱导(丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼)、插管和开始PPV后10 - 15分钟进行第二次检查。检查包括心尖四腔、两腔和三腔切面、二尖瓣和主动脉瓣多普勒血流速度以及三尖瓣和二尖瓣环的组织多普勒速度。测定左心室收缩末期弹性(Ees)和主动脉弹性(Ea)。
全身麻醉和PPV使平均动脉血压降低(-29%,p < 0.0019)、每搏量指数降低(-13%,p < 0.001)和心脏指数降低(-23%,p < 0.001)。右心室舒张末期面积指数和左心室舒张末期容积指数显著降低,而全身血管阻力未受显著影响。麻醉诱导后Ees显著降低(-23%,p = 0.002),而Ea有降低趋势(p = 0.053)。心室 - 动脉耦联,即Ea/Ees,未受麻醉药和PPV的显著影响。左心室GLS从-19.1±2.3%降至-17.3±2.9%(p < 0.001),右心室游离壁应变从-26.5±3.9%降至-24.1±4.2%(p = 0.001)。1例患者(5%)在基线时左心室GLS > -16%,而在全身麻醉和PPV期间有6例患者(28%)如此。3例患者(14%)右心室游离壁应变 > -24%,而在全身麻醉和PPV期间有8例患者(38%)如此。
全身麻醉和PPV将左心室和右心室的收缩功能降低到在相当比例的无心肌疾病患者中被认为表明功能障碍的水平。