Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark; Center for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):1367-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (TFUS) holds great promise as a highly focal technique for transcranial stimulation even for deep brain areas. Yet, knowledge about the safety of this novel technique is still limited.
To systematically review safety related aspects of TFUS. The review covers the mechanisms-of-action by which TFUS may cause adverse effects and the available data on the possible occurrence of such effects in animal and human studies.
Initial screening used key term searches in PubMed and bioRxiv, and a review of the literature lists of relevant papers. We included only studies where safety assessment was performed, and this results in 33 studies, both in humans and animals.
Adverse effects of TFUS were very rare. At high stimulation intensity and/or rate, TFUS may cause haemorrhage, cell death or damage, and unintentional blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening. TFUS may also unintentionally affect long-term neural activity and behaviour. A variety of methods was used mainly in rodents to evaluate these adverse effects, including tissue staining, magnetic resonance imaging, temperature measurements and monitoring of neural activity and behaviour. In 30 studies, adverse effects were absent, even though at least one Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety index was frequently exceeded. Two studies reported microhaemorrhages after long or relatively intense stimulation above safety limits. Another study reported BBB opening and neuronal damage in a control condition, which intentionally and substantially exceeded the safety limits.
Most studies point towards a favourable safety profile of TFUS. Further investigations are warranted to establish a solid safety framework for the therapeutic window of TFUS to reliably avoid adverse effects while ensuring neural effectiveness. The comparability across studies should be improved by a more standardized reporting of TFUS parameters.
低强度经颅聚焦超声刺激(TFUS)作为一种高度聚焦的经颅刺激技术具有很大的潜力,即使是针对深部脑区也是如此。然而,关于这种新技术的安全性的知识仍然有限。
系统地回顾 TFUS 的安全性相关方面。该综述涵盖了 TFUS 可能引起不良反应的作用机制,以及在动物和人体研究中可能发生这些不良反应的可用数据。
最初的筛选使用了 PubMed 和 bioRxiv 中的关键词搜索,并对相关文献的文献列表进行了审查。我们只纳入了进行了安全性评估的研究,这导致了 33 项研究,包括在人和动物中的研究。
TFUS 的不良反应非常罕见。在高刺激强度和/或频率下,TFUS 可能导致出血、细胞死亡或损伤,以及无意的血脑屏障(BBB)开放。TFUS 还可能无意中影响长期的神经活动和行为。各种方法主要在啮齿动物中用于评估这些不良反应,包括组织染色、磁共振成像、温度测量以及监测神经活动和行为。在 30 项研究中,即使至少一个食品和药物管理局(FDA)安全指数经常被超过,也没有出现不良反应。两项研究报告了在超过安全限制的长时间或相对高强度刺激后出现微出血。另一项研究报告了在故意且大幅超过安全限制的对照条件下 BBB 开放和神经元损伤。
大多数研究表明 TFUS 的安全性良好。需要进一步的研究来建立 TFUS 的治疗窗口的可靠安全性框架,以可靠地避免不良反应,同时确保神经有效性。通过更标准化地报告 TFUS 参数,可以提高研究之间的可比性。