University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Community Health. 2020 Feb;45(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00716-8.
In US adults aged < 65 years, pneumococcal vaccination is recommended when high-risk conditions are present, but vaccine uptake is low. Additionally, there are race-based differences in illness risk and vaccination rates. The cost-effectiveness of programs to improve vaccine uptake or of alternative vaccination policies to increase protection is unclear. A decision analysis compared, in US black and general population cohorts aged 50 years, the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination recommendations, without and with a vaccine uptake improvement program, and alternative population vaccine policies. Program-based uptake improvement (base case: 12.3% absolute increase, costing $1.78/eligible patient) was based on clinical trial data. US data informed population-specific pneumococcal risk. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using Delphi panel and trial data. In both black and general population cohorts, an uptake improvement program for current vaccination recommendations was favored, costing $48,621 per QALY gained in black populations ($54,929/QALY in the general population) compared to current recommendations without a program. Alternative vaccination policies largely prevented less illness and were economically unfavorable. In sensitivity analyses, uptake programs were favored, at a $100,000/QALY threshold, unless they improved absolute vaccine uptake < 2.1% in blacks or < 2.6% in the general population. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses. Programs to increase adult pneumococcal vaccination uptake are economically reasonable compared to changes in vaccination recommendations, and more favorable in underserved minorities than in the general population. If addressing race-based health disparities is a priority, evidence-based programs to increase vaccination should be considered.
在美国,年龄小于 65 岁的成年人,如果存在高危情况,建议接种肺炎球菌疫苗,但疫苗接种率较低。此外,疾病风险和疫苗接种率存在基于种族的差异。提高疫苗接种率的项目或增加保护的替代疫苗接种政策的成本效益尚不清楚。一项决策分析比较了美国黑人 50 岁和一般人群队列中,在没有和有疫苗接种率提高计划的情况下,肺炎球菌疫苗接种建议、替代人群疫苗接种政策的公共卫生影响和成本效益。基于项目的接种率提高(基础情况:绝对增加 12.3%,每位合格患者成本为 1.78 美元)基于临床试验数据。美国数据为特定人群的肺炎球菌风险提供信息。疫苗效力使用 Delphi 小组和试验数据进行估算。在黑人队列和一般人群队列中,目前的疫苗接种建议的接种率提高计划更受欢迎,在黑人人群中每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本为 48621 美元(一般人群中的每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本为 54929 美元),而不采取项目的现行建议。替代疫苗接种政策在很大程度上预防了较少的疾病,并且在经济上不利。在敏感性分析中,在 10 万美元/QALY 的阈值下,接种率提高计划更受欢迎,除非它们能使黑人的绝对疫苗接种率提高超过 2.1%,或者一般人群的绝对疫苗接种率提高超过 2.6%。敏感性分析结果稳健。与改变疫苗接种建议相比,提高成人肺炎球菌疫苗接种率的项目在经济上是合理的,而且在服务不足的少数族裔中比在一般人群中更有利。如果解决基于种族的健康差异是一个优先事项,那么应该考虑基于证据的增加疫苗接种的项目。